Danger Den "Open" vs "Maze" Copper Waterblocks

Add Your Comments

SUMMARY: Removing the “Maze” also removed some performance – the “Maze” is a performance-enhancing feature.

Danger Den was not only nice enough to send samples of their latest copper waterblocks to test out, but they also drilled holes in the blocks so I could insert my thermal probe into the base.

Probe

As the pic above shows, I asked Danger Den to bore a 1/16″ hole into the base of the waterblock – the base of the hole is over the CPU’s core. I inserted the thermocouple wire into the hole and epoxied it into place. This enables me to more accurately measure temps at the top of the CPU to assess cooling performance.

Danger Den sent us two designs to test out: One is their “Maze”

Maze Block

as shown above. Customers have been asking for an “Open” design – this is one in which a round chamber has been bored into the copper

Open Block

Picture from Danger Den.

as shown in the pic above. No maze, just open space.

To test out how each does, I used Danger Den’s Cooling Cube with a Danner 1.5 submersible pump to cool a Duron 800 @ 1000, 1.93 volts, 53.75 watts, on an ABIT KT7. I used the Omega HH23 Digital Thermometer to measure temps after running Prime 95 for about two hours. The only change made was changing waterblocks. I ran three series of tests, alternating blocks etc., to ensure consistent results.

TEST RESULTS
Block

CPU Temp

Ambient Temp

Delta

C/W

Water Temp

Rad Exit Temp

MAZE

28.5 C

22.0 C

6.5 C

0.12

24.5 C

24.2 C

OPEN

30.8 C

22.3 C

8.5 C

0.16

24.7 C

24.1 C

Ambient temp measured at radiator fan, exit at radiator exhaust, fan blowing through the radiator; water temp measured at pump reservoir.

Looks like the block design alone accounts for a 2 C improvement in CPU temps – clearly the “Maze” is more efficient at removing heat than an empty space.

Based on some work I had done a while ago with heatsinks in water, no question that adding fins results in improved performance. The Danger Den design exposes more copper surface area to water which, I believe, accounts for its better performance compared to the “Open” design. Just as in air cooled heatsinks, surface area is the name of the game.

Interesting to see what more surface area does for performance. I’d really like to see some more innovative approaches to increasing surface area in waterblocks – any takers??

Thanks again to Danger Den for sending the blocks and accommodating my testing needs.

Email Joe



Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *