View Full Version : P4 2.26@3180
Almost final results from my 2.26 o\c
SL683
fpo/batch L218B026
Pack date 28/06/2002
Asus P4B533-E
1007E Bios
Prometeia cooling
-8C idle
-2C full load
Vcore 1.70
P.S.
I was never lucky enough with my picks
I expected more from this cpu
:(
jdmcnudgent
08-03-02, 05:39 PM
you da man. nice oc, cant wait to get my new one, my old one died.:(
Originally posted by jdmcnudgent
you da man. nice oc, cant wait to get my new one, my old one died.:(
JD, whats the status on ur system?
jdmcnudgent
08-03-02, 05:52 PM
Originally posted by NO1
JD, whats the status on ur system? see siggy bro. :D
Originally posted by jdmcnudgent
you da man. nice oc, cant wait to get my new one, my old one died.:(
Sorry to hear that
jdmcnudgent
08-03-02, 06:12 PM
Originally posted by TASOS
Sorry to hear that thanks buddie, it was such a nice little chippy.:( hopefully when i get my new one, i will be where you are at.:D
Originally posted by jdmcnudgent
thanks buddie, it was such a nice little chippy.:( hopefully when i get my new one, i will be where you are at.:D
I wish you the best of luck...or...how you say in US ?
...God Speed ?
Nice screenshotw TASOS...I also like your cool style...:beer:
P.S. I yesterday ordered Prometia system...do you know how lond is it take to be here???
Originally posted by hipro5
Nice screenshotw TASOS...I also like your cool style...:beer:
P.S. I yesterday ordered Prometia system...do you know how lond is it take to be here???
5-10 days
From what i think...they are assembling them after you order
They dont seem to have them in stock
Thanks, I'll wait ....:beer:
Rasputin'sLiver
08-03-02, 07:49 PM
Originally posted by TASOS
I was never lucky enough with my picks
I expected more from this cpu
:(
you might have expected more but you could have done much worse... well done!:D
Originally posted by Rasputin'sLiver
you might have expected more but you could have done much worse... well done!:D
Yes,that's true also
Thanks
Nice OC buddy :) . But I've noticed a few odd things here. SuperPi for one. Your time at 1M is 1 min 15 secs. Should be way faster than that, mine's 59 secs. at ~3 Ghz (aircooled with a low noise fan too). I don't think RDRAM is that much faster. Maybe your cpu is throttling, although with your cooling that does sound very odd (to say the least). Also your SiSandra MIPS looks a bit low, while MFLOPS looks ok. Both your SiSandra CPU-MM results look like "they should", compared to mine at least. Here you have my SuperPi SS:
And here's my SiSandra CPU benchmark screenshot:
http://forum.oc-forums.com/vb/attachment.php?s=&postid=803122
Originally posted by Turbo
Nice OC buddy. But I've noticed a few odd things here. SuperPi for one. your time is 1 min 15 secs. Should be way faster than that, mine's 59 secs. at ~3 Ghz aircooled with a low noise fan too. I don't think RDRAM is that much faster. Maybe your cpu is throttling, although with your cooling that does sound odd (to say the least). Also you SiSandra MIPS looks a bit low, while MFLOPS looks ok. Here you have my SuperPi SS:
My mem is @ the slowest setting
2.5-3-3-7....perhaps that's why my score is lower than your.
Now about MIPS....that's what i get
Yeah the SiSandra MIPS score can really fluctuate quite a bit, so I wouldn't worry too much about that either, but the SuperPi thing I really don't get. From 59 secs to 75 secs, thats 25% slower with a ~150 Mhz faster cpu. That is just really odd :rolleyes:
Dirty_Punk
08-06-02, 06:33 AM
Originally posted by Turbo
Nice OC buddy . But I've noticed a few odd things here. SuperPi for one. Your time at 1M is 1 min 15 secs. Should be way faster than that, mine's 59 secs. at ~3 Ghz (aircooled with a low noise fan too). I don't think RDRAM is that much faster. Maybe your cpu is throttling, although with your cooling that does sound very odd (to say the least). Also your SiSandra MIPS looks a bit low, while MFLOPS looks ok. Both your SiSandra CPU-MM results look like "they should", compared to mine at least. Here you have my SuperPi SS:
hehe, i beat you with my poor system!!!
the first is fast as yours
http://digilander.libero.it/DirtyPunker/1600@3015.JPG
the second is the winner
http://digilander.libero.it/DirtyPunker/1800@3032.JPG :D
the first is at 1:1 cas 2.5-5-2-2
the second at 3:4 cas 2.5-6-2-2 (~226mhz)
mobo Abit it7 voltmod
vddr about 2.85
watercooled with Lunasio RS
:D :p
Originally posted by Dirty_Punk
hehe, i beat you with my poor system!!!
LOL, you sure did. That's one really nice o/c on a 1.8 too :D Only goes to prove that PASOS should be able to finish the darn thing in like <55 secs.
Yaappp...If you notice to Dirty_Punk's foto's,he has DISABLE ALL OF WINDOWS XP fades,delayes and all the other stuff to run this bench...
Dirty_Punk
08-06-02, 07:35 AM
Originally posted by hipro5
Yaappp...If you notice to Dirty_Punk's foto's,he has DISABLE ALL OF WINDOWS XP fades,delayes and all the other stuff to run this bench...
yes, but don't change anything... :(
there is no difference between winxp with normal interface and poor interface ;)
i test closing explorer and another service (free 20mb of ram), but change nothing :(
but 1:15 it's damn hight. At 2560 and ram at 3:4 with the 1600, i do 1:06!!! (like 2750 ram 1:1)
for a 3ghz 1:15 it's normal only if you have sdram!!! :D
Yeah, I may try that later on tonight. Maybe I could shave off a second or 2 there as well :D I've got antivirus/firewall, logitech keyboard/mouse stuff etc. all running in the background. Now while I try to improve my SuperPI, I'd like to see his Prime95 benchmark and 3DMark results :D Or how about an SiSandra memory benchmark :p
Dirty_Punk
08-06-02, 07:53 AM
for 3dmark i have a poor kyro 1 videocard!!! i have no money (i prefer to spend it elsewere, in chiller or plet soon) and i'm not interested to do a record (with 3dmark), i'm only interested to overclock cpu because i'm testing waterblocks, so great videocard isn't needed.
In the test pc i don't have internet at all, so i have downloaded (from work) prime95 but it won't works with'out internet.
This evening if you want i try with all the interface option enables and show that there isn't any improve/decrease in performance. Now i'm at work and i can't.
The winxp is also just installed, with no application in background (it's only a test machine, i don't use it a lot)
i don't know what are you meaning of sandra membench :confused:
Dirty_Punk
08-06-02, 07:55 AM
I've got antivirus/firewall, logitech keyboard/mouse stuff etc. all running in the background.
probably you can take 1s closing it, but not sure. I have tried superpi with hwmonitor monitoring active, and there is no difference in performance.
The memory usage in teh system don't change so much in superpi, an application running continuosly in background maybe yes
(PS: sorry for my english, i'm italian!! :p )
Dirty_Punk
08-06-02, 08:00 AM
here you can se in an old shot that my cpu at 2996 do 58s with all active
http://digilander.libero.it/DirtyPunker/58s.JPG
so it's normal to do 1 second lower with 40mhz in cpu and 8mhz in ram, but if you think that i'm laying i'll post the 57s with interface options on...:rolleyes: :argue: :p
Originally posted by Dirty_Punk
(PS: sorry for my english, i'm italian!! :p )
Hey, no problemo :D I'm Danish, so don't mind my french either; LOL. I'm about to strap on the 'ol Delta EHE fan. I'm running mine at 2.9 with a 2000 rpm fan for everyday use, I can't stand the noise of the Delta for too long...;)
Dirty_Punk
08-06-02, 11:56 AM
see this (http://digilander.libero.it/DirtyPunker/1800@3032TOTAL.JPG)
this is the 57s shot with normal interface, and some sandra test
the memory test has no mmx/sse options selected, so to have a 3000mhz or a 2000mhz doesn't change the result (elsewere your memory bench will be always highter than mine because you have a 3100 and i a 3000)
i've done 58s with the 1600@3060, but no shot for now, i'm working on it ;)
Dirty_Punk
08-06-02, 12:01 PM
the disk bench is so low... why??? :confused:
Hmm, can't get below 58 secs :confused: Anyway, I'll have to learn to live with that :D ;)
Dirty_Punk
08-06-02, 12:17 PM
to go under 58s you must have great memory bandwidth. Another italian, DDA, with a 2260@~3080 with 4:5 on memori can hit 57s with the 4g4a+ (that has more memory bandwidth than my IT7). Now i'm in race with he ti hit 56s, but both are stopped by OVP of the mobo, no vcore over 1.88!!! :( (only for test, in normal use i use 1600@2700 or 1800@2700 both at ~1.6v)
It's probably my memory latency (I've got RDRAM) that's killing me. I'm not exactly suffering in the bandwidth department. Also, it could just be the rounding up/down of the numbers that make the difference seem bigger than it actually is. Here's a memory shot for ya' :)
Dirty_Punk
08-06-02, 12:23 PM
wow!!! mega bandwidth!!!!!! can you uncheck mmx/sse options in memory module, so i can compare with my memory bench?! tnx!!
Sure. I've taken the Delta out though and put my low noise fan on again, so here's one at 2.9 Ghz/170 Mhz fsb, rdram at 3x. At 3034 Mhz it would probably be just over around 2040/2100. With mmx/sse/sse2 enabled I get around 3530/3528 at 170 Mhz fsb, which is about 200/200 less then at 178 Mhz fsb.
Dirty_Punk
08-06-02, 12:54 PM
great bench!!!! i can't past 1800, i arrive only at ~1770 with 170fsb 3:4 cas latency 2.5-6-2-2 at 2.86v :( (it's good for a ddr, but not enought for me!!! :D ). Now i'm doing burnin!! :D
vBulletin® v3.8.7, Copyright ©2000-2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.