NV30 bench...?

[Ronin]

NV30 Bench? (http://babelfish.altavista.com/urltrurl?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.pcpop.com.cn%2Fview. asp%3Ftype%3Dnews%26id%3D7722&lp=zh_en&tt=url)


I ran it through a translator......dont shun me or anything, but wtf is that?

[Darth]

wtf... i thought the nv30 hasnt taped out yet

*EDIT*
not so sure if id want to believe these guys, this is just BS
http://babelfish.altavista.com/urltrurl?lp=zh_en&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.pcpop.com.cn%2Fview.asp%3Ftyp e%3Dnews%26id%3D7702

[Rav]

Fake, or atleast BS. I don't even think Nvidia has working NV30's let alone has one to give to an obscure foreign website. If anything they are "estimating" the scores based on the paperwork... I doubt it will do anything near those scores because of bottlenecks in other parts of the system. I mean come on:

Quake III 1280x1024xc32@fsaa 4x test = 600 FPS

I think they just want attention.

-Rav

[Darkseid]

Fake Fake Fake!!

[Darkseid]

Come on, the hammer faster than Itanium?? who are this guys?
i don`t believe any of those links

[Ronin]

Originally posted by Rav
Fake, or atleast BS. I don't even think Nvidia has working NV30's let alone has one to give to an obscure foreign website. If anything they are "estimating" the scores based on the paperwork... I doubt it will do anything near those scores because of bottlenecks in other parts of the system. I mean come on:

Quake III 1280x1024xc32@fsaa 4x test = 600 FPS

I think they just want attention.

-Rav No, i read it that way at first too, look closer, that 600 is coming from the pixelshadery test. Quake 3 is, Radeon 9700 = 200, and NV30 at 250.

But yeah, the whole thing seems bogus. My friend showed it to me, and i was like wtf?!

Then i decided to wait to hear from Anandtech. :) For much thorough "testing".