PDA

View Full Version : Idea for saving some bandwidth


the_poche
08-22-02, 11:56 PM
How about an option for hosting our avatars images? That would save a lot of bandwidth , dont you think?

cyber mouse45
08-23-02, 02:28 PM
Would that work? If it did, that would be a cool idea. Then we could all have 700k avatars! :D

the_poche
08-23-02, 05:00 PM
lol, just put a movie in there :D

JigPu
08-23-02, 07:21 PM
Originally posted by cyber mouse45
Would that work? If it did, that would be a cool idea. Then we could all have 700k avatars! :D
Woah... And the original 200K avatars were pretty much movies in them selves!! I would just love to see what some of the Avatar Guild could do with a whopping 700K (though I'd hate to download over this 56K connection...)

JigPu

Christoph
08-23-02, 09:31 PM
Ugh! I don't think that I could fill 700k of avatar space. Come to think of it I doubt that I've even made 700k worth of avatars.

I like the idea of off-site avatar hosting, though. It would certainly help skip out. The only problem I see is that it would put a large burden somewhere else. I wouldn't mind hosting my avatar at auctionwatch, but I'm not so sure that they'd be happy about it.

Maxvla
08-23-02, 09:34 PM
how bout having the option of having it hosted elsewhere... not make it mandatory. i have guaranteed speed for myself so i would be able to do that.

anyone else who wants me to host for them i would be open to. i have tons of space and 120x120 avy's even motion gif's aren't very big.

CrystalMethod
08-23-02, 09:56 PM
Originally posted by the_poche
How about an option for hosting our avatars images? That would save a lot of bandwidth , dont you think?

It would put additional stress on the server, and take up space if they implemented that.

Maxvla
08-23-02, 10:46 PM
Originally posted by CrystalMethod


It would put additional stress on the server, and take up space if they implemented that.
he means having a 3rd party server host the avatars for our site. this wouldn't hurt our bandwidth at all... i believe.

Crash893
08-24-02, 02:12 AM
why does it have to be all at once place

i think we should do somthing like this

host it from your own diffent website ( distrubte the load)

mabey have a default 50k or less one you leave with skip incase it cant be reached

or if some one says in the user cp that they down want 700k avatars

i dont know if this could be done but its a good idea ( at least i think)

Maxvla
08-24-02, 02:42 AM
sure thats what i meant... everyone puts theirs up where they have access. those who don't have access get the old fashioned way like it is now.

and default should just be nothing or a red x so you know when something is messed up.

cack01
08-25-02, 12:15 AM
there should also be an option to disable avatars, b/c I don't think many 56kers would enjoy having to wait for those 700K avatars to load.

Maxvla
08-25-02, 12:55 AM
Originally posted by cack01
there should also be an option to disable avatars, b/c I don't think many 56kers would enjoy having to wait for those 700K avatars to load.
there is.