View Full Version : How does this Sandra2002 mem score look ?
HeXenViRii
10-19-02, 10:06 PM
The ram:
Infineon pc133 cas3 3.3v
The OC:
152FSB , 3-2-3 , no interleave , all rest optimal ram settings , 3.6v
The results:
1130
1108
Completely stable
How does that look ? I was woundering how it fairs against other pc133's ... Its on a Abit KT7a-Raid , with an underclocked tbird 1.4 @ 912 (im working on the watercooling situation)
Overclocker456
10-20-02, 02:59 AM
by todays standards it's crap.. you're running PC152 Cas 3..you're better off at Cas2 PC133 if you as me
How about mine? I'm running samsung 2700 512mb ram.
2508
2376
running at cas 2 agressive ram timings, 173MHz.
100% stable
Seal
maxima88
10-20-02, 07:15 AM
Originally posted by seal
How about mine? I'm running samsung 2700 512mb ram.
2508
2376
running at cas 2 agressive ram timings, 173MHz.
100% stable
Seal
nice score, but you could still try to get it up a bit more.
Here's mine:
HeXenViRii
10-20-02, 09:06 AM
I know for today standards its bad ; but for what i got is it what was expected ? at p133 cas 2 my scores were ~980-1000 , so i think that pc152 cas3 is better ....
Penguin4x4
10-20-02, 12:04 PM
Here's how to tell:
PC133 uses 133.3333333333333333333MHz on 8 byte bus. Multiply the two, you get 1066.666666666666666666667MB/Second Max. Theoretical Bandwidth
Now take actual, divide my maximum theoretical, multiply by 100 to get your % effeciency.
On a 152MHz bus with PC133, MTB is 1216, so you are getting ~@93% Effeciency, which is quite good!
Penguin4x4
10-20-02, 12:15 PM
Seal, your's looks on par, Overclocker456, read this:
http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/showthread.php?threadid=3849
:)
HeXenViRii
10-20-02, 12:56 PM
Thanks for the helpful info Penguin
Overclocker456
10-20-02, 12:57 PM
Yeah Penguin.. I've know that since my P4B266.. P4 systems aren't too affected by Cas latency, Bandwith is were it's at for P4, everyone knows this. But he's running a Athlon that much rather have a Cas2 than a Cas3..
HeXenViRii
10-20-02, 01:00 PM
I was doing a test to see what the difference would be @ 2-2-2 & @ 3-3-3 , so i brought down the fsb to 100 . At 3-3-3 i got 745/730 and at 2-2-2 i got 751/741 . If u average them together thats only a ~1% increase , so i think i will be happy with my non-cas agressive settings .. :D
Overclocker456
10-20-02, 05:06 PM
Originally posted by HeXenViRii
I was doing a test to see what the difference would be @ 2-2-2 & @ 3-3-3 , so i brought down the fsb to 100 . At 3-3-3 i got 745/730 and at 2-2-2 i got 751/741 . If u average them together thats only a ~1% increase , so i think i will be happy with my non-cas agressive settings .. :D
I hope you know Sandra isn't the only way to test out your memory bandwith. Run 3Dmark 2000 at 640x480 and set your video card to the lowest settings... then tell me what's faster..
HeXenViRii
10-20-02, 05:10 PM
all i got is 3dmark 2001se , will that do ?
Overclocker456
10-20-02, 05:12 PM
Originally posted by HeXenViRii
all i got is 3dmark 2001se , will that do ?
not really, 3Dmark2001SE is way more video card intensive. You want to eliminate the video card as a bottle neck and use 3Dmark2000 at the lowest settings..
HeXenViRii
10-20-02, 07:48 PM
Originally posted by Overclocker456
not really, 3Dmark2001SE is way more video card intensive. You want to eliminate the video card as a bottle neck and use 3Dmark2000 at the lowest settings..
3Dmark2000
900 9x100 2-2-2 = 4165
900 9x100 3-3-3 = 3986 -4.2%
933 7x133 2-2-3 = 4495 (the fastest I could go)
933 7x133 3-3-3 = 4409 -1.9%
900 6x150 3-2-3 = 4571 +1.6%
haha you kids.... check my mem score... :) :) :)
http://webpages.charter.net/kobycole/images/computerpics/ddr333_4-6ratio.jpg
HeXenViRii
10-20-02, 08:23 PM
Originally posted by koby
haha you kids.... check my mem score... :) :) :)
lol " maybe we could all just live without the wise cracks"
HeXenViRii
10-20-02, 08:25 PM
And people , plz learn to "cut out" the extra stuff from your print screens or shrink them for us "regular" people , that pic is huge !!
maxima88
10-21-02, 10:11 AM
That huge pic is exactly the reason why pics in this forum have been limited to 300x300. It takes up too much space.
Natedog
10-21-02, 03:40 PM
I think this one is kinda good :)
edit: ok I made it smaller http://www.theforumisdown.com/uploadfiles/0802/modified.jpg
HeXenViRii
10-21-02, 04:00 PM
me and my puiney 300mhz system bus :D
residentevil2
10-22-02, 04:00 AM
Originally posted by maxima88
nice score, but you could still try to get it up a bit more.
Here's mine:
lol maxima youre score is like 190 fsb with pc 3200 ram.
I get same as him since i have 512 mb pc 2700 i get around 2600:2500
Before with 256 mb i got the same as maxima
vBulletin® v3.8.7, Copyright ©2000-2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.