Whats the performance increase on oficial 40.72 Det

[Lord Moreira]

Come on come on :D
I want the details
i can't test them myself on my rig :(
My psu died on me , waiting for new antec....
Keep it posted
:burn:
U Can get the official 40.72 HERE (http://www.nvidia.com/view.asp?IO=winxp-2k_40.72)

[TheFrag]

i am curious to. I would compare but i am to lazy to run 3dmark on this mx400 PCI. I will wait till I get my ALbatron ti4200p Turbo. C'mon, someone not lazy like me test them!

[Lord Moreira]

Niiiiice
as for now since i don't have any testing software on this temp Rig i'll tell u this...
Using Earth viewer a satelite simulator from nvidia on a GTS 32meg it would take forever to zoom in on a city and wait for quality refresh (Laggy)
I just tried it and it's like i was running a Ti4200 !
I **** u not:eek:
they posted a prediction of a 25% performance boost on www.nvidia.com , i know i got @ least that!!!!
Can't wait to run a 3dmark with my G3ti500 OC'd and my G4Ti4400 Oc'd also.
Do i see @ least a 1k boost in 3dmark2001...............
I'll keep u guys posted
Very impressed better performance boost then the 1 we had from the Detonator 3 to Detonator 4 Beta by a long shot...

[RangerJoe]

40.71's have some of the best performance out there, havnt tested the WQHL certified 40.72's yet, but the 41.30's (think thats right) seem to work just great

can be found at www.guru3d.com

[mbentley]

i don't see any benchmarking differences between the whql cert. drivers and the uncert. ones. it just seems like they are just approved so you don't have to hit the little windows warning that your computer may have a meltdown if you install non-whql cert. drivers on your computer :D

[el]

Originally posted by mbentley
i don't see any benchmarking differences between the whql cert. drivers and the uncert. ones. it just seems like they are just approved so you don't have to hit the little windows warning that your computer may have a meltdown if you install non-whql cert. drivers on your computer :D

true

I hit 10,007 with the 40.72 and seem to be improving all the time. xp at 1524 and ti4200 at 265/479. so turbo owners are going to be like 330/700 and smoke me.

[SlowBurn]

Originally posted by RangerJoe
40.71's have some of the best performance out there, havnt tested the WQHL certified 40.72's yet, but the 41.30's (think thats right) seem to work just great

can be found at www.guru3d.com

If you mean the 41.03s I have some gripes about them atm. I mean the picture quality has drastically improved, but for some reason I can't run my Geforce Ti4600 at 330/700 anymore. 3DMark won't even start the bench. Anyone else have this problem?

[el]

no I just starting working with the 40.72 and haven't heard much about the 4130.

l8r

[mbentley]

Originally posted by SlowBurn


If you mean the 41.03s I have some gripes about them atm. I mean the picture quality has drastically improved, but for some reason I can't run my Geforce Ti4600 at 330/700 anymore. 3DMark won't even start the bench. Anyone else have this problem?

i had the exact same problem. i would click the start button and nothing would happen. i turned it back to the default clock speeds and it was fine... must be something with the leaked drivers...

[SlowBurn]

Originally posted by mbentley


i had the exact same problem. i would click the start button and nothing would happen. i turned it back to the default clock speeds and it was fine... must be something with the leaked drivers...

Did you go back down to the new 40.72s and is it fine now? I haven't tried it yet, been too busy with RL stuff.

[mbentley]

Originally posted by SlowBurn


Did you go back down to the new 40.72s and is it fine now? I haven't tried it yet, been too busy with RL stuff.

i just did a driver rollback and it's fine now... weird... oh well... guess i will just wait until they become certified or maybe i will just skip the 41.03's. as long as it works :)