View Full Version : Intel's pricing is INSANE
(prices taken from newegg)
a 2.8GHz P4 - $389
a 3.06GHz P4 (w/ Hyper Threading)- $800!!!!
HOLY SHIZNIT! You could get two 2.8's for the price of a 3.06! ( or almost FIVE 2.0a's that could prob overclock very close to that speed!)
Overclocker550
12-03-02, 01:32 AM
if you get lucky. also no hyperthread. that said, id still get a 1.8GHz and hope ill luck out to 2.7GHz
hooziewhatsit
12-03-02, 01:47 AM
and an athlon XP 2700+ (333 bus) for $325 :eek:
My knowledge of hyper threading is limited at the moment, but I bet that it isn't worth the excessive price. I would get the 3.06 if I was rich and had money to throw away :D
BaldHeadedDork
12-03-02, 02:12 AM
Take that attitude and you wouldn't be rich for long. ;)
If it makes you young'uns feel better, Intel used to launch their fastest chips at over $1,000. If I remember correctly, the first P2-300 retailed at something like $1,150.
BHD
DDR-PIII
12-03-02, 03:02 AM
p-II's @ 1.5k ? that musta been in'96 ?
Namagomi
12-03-02, 11:53 AM
Yeah, back before AMD put the pressure on and made sure that Intel couldn't just shoot the moon when it came to CPU prices.
And yeah, a 450 was around 1.5k retail at launch. a Falcon Northwest Mach V (the Alienware of the day) had a 450mhz bleeding-edge box that cost 5k!! :eek!: Now an "overpriced" box is 1.5k :D
RedDeathDrinker
12-03-02, 03:11 PM
The 3.06GHz P4 with hyperthreading is around £580 over here.....
I could build an XP1800 system complete for that......
BaldHeadedDork
12-04-02, 01:09 AM
Originally posted by DDR-PIII
p-II's @ 1.5k ? that musta been in'96 ?
And give that man a cigar.
Though I wrote $1,150. For some reason I remember that price from a Treasure Chest Computer's ad in Computer Shopper. (Back in the day when Computer Shopper was bigger than most phone books....)
BHD
Stumpjumper5200
12-08-02, 02:39 PM
WOW!
I paid $540 USD for my 2.8 :D
Price sure dropped didn't it? LOL! hehe
progamer
12-09-02, 01:07 AM
Definitely. I know of a friend who's dad bought a 386 computer for around $4000. It's sitting there and gathering up dust now.
Crazy Jayhawk
12-09-02, 01:30 AM
Sounds like that article from the front page - the 3.06 will never be a good deal.
Stumpjumper5200
12-09-02, 02:07 AM
The 3.06 will NEVER be a good deal? How do you figure?
Top end this year is mainstream next year and bargain box the year after.
And when the 3.06 drops to (for example) $300, the 2.8 will prob be like $150, so yes, the 3.06 will NEVER be a good deal
Stumpjumper5200
12-09-02, 03:08 PM
Yeah, but the 3.06 will have the HT on and the 2.8 won't.
I think they WILL be selling slower CPU's with HT on, but they'll probably cost more than the ones with it off anyway.
6502kid
12-09-02, 03:34 PM
I paid 398 bucks for my P3-S a year and some months ago.
But, it is getting a PR1750 or so in Sandra and runs
UT2k3 great, so I am still happy with it.
I think they still want 200 bucks for a new one.....
richardjohn31
12-09-02, 03:48 PM
Thats weird, at Alienware.com it's possible to upgrade from 2.8 to 3.06 for $313
Stumpjumper5200
12-09-02, 04:21 PM
That sounds pretty much like the price difference from 2.8 to 3.06 anyway
jdmcnudgent
12-09-02, 07:00 PM
yeah, thats terrible, condsidering that a lot of cpus, 1000, (3.06) are only $18. each.:(
Captain Slug
12-09-02, 09:21 PM
I think you should look at it from Intel's point of view.
They currently OWN almost the entire OEM market. Why should they put reasonable prices on their open-market CPUs, when that would hurt the stock of the companies that they make the most money from?
</evil thinking>
vBulletin® v3.8.7, Copyright ©2000-2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.