View Full Version : Getright or DAP which one you prefer?
I wonder what you people prefer to use getright or DAP? personally i started with getright than i switched to DAP and yesterday i downloaded getright 5.0 and i like it i think i will get rid of DAP now coz getright also supports multiple server downloads and i have lately had some bad experiences with DAP (loads of corrupt files maybe due to resumes or i am just being paranoid)
Do broadband users need these "resume" utilities or they are just for poor ol dial suck users?
WyrmMaster
12-21-02, 07:04 PM
Actually, i prefer flashget. Best download manager i have used. Yah, i have broadband and i use it, its just useful.
cryogen97
12-21-02, 07:54 PM
Been a DAP user for a while, and I'll probably stick with it. It does everything I need it to.
xCarne_Asada
12-21-02, 08:24 PM
i use DAP and i like it because you can resume files. That way in case you are doing something else while the file is downloading that causes your computer to crash you can just reboot and start the download from where you were.
I've used Getright since about version 2.0. I love it! :)
I've used both (neither right now) and Getright was better. However, as I recall it produced spyware so I neutered it so it wouldn't litter my system with that stuff. I forget exactly how I did it but it involved using Ad-aware and following some guy's instructions posted on cnet.com. Worked great. My downloader with WinXP does okay with my high speed connection so I don't see a need to use them anymore.
I use DAP right now i love it, but i havnt used getright for years and cant actually remember what it was like. Lots of people saying its good so maybe i'll give it a go again.
I have been using DAP for a while too but lately i was getting loads of corrupt files and i presumed it had something to do with DAP so i am now trying out getright and i like the new version maybe its my wierd thoughts but i think getright downloads at faster speeds than DAP does
vBulletin® v3.8.7, Copyright ©2000-2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.