This a good 3dmark score

[wildbilly2k]

i was looking and comparing to the rest but some people were in the 12k so i dont know how i did but i guess i am at all stock also

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=5444102

[wildbilly2k]

re ran it and now im just a few marks away from 12k

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=5444317

[Evnas]

Thats good for ur system. That 1900+ is a little bottlemeck for the 9700 Pro though.

[wildbilly2k]

yeah when i get the cash since i fixed my speakers im going for 2600+ 333 fsb

i did copmpare it to all the other 1900+ and i was in the middle cause some of these guys did overclock there radeon 9700 pros

[Rotary-Motion]

hi

compare mine but in the test its dx8.1 and CAT2.4 !!!

i now have CAT3.0 and dx9 in and lost 500 pionts !!!!

defaults on card and oc on cpu !!!

[timmyqwest]

i just benchmarked my compaq...boy that was a $1200 POS (last year). scored 4900. Cant wait till i get my new puter

[DaedalusX]

Are you sure that's okay for a 1900+? I got 12952 marks with my 1700+ and that's obviously a huge bottleneck for my 9700 Pro.

I'm fixing to get myself a 2800+ here pretty quick. Of course the fact that I'm using Samsung PC3200 and 8X agp must be cool.

[wildbilly2k]

well it was average kinda in the middle for the 1900+ plus i think my processor is dying anyways


could also be dx9 cat3.0

[walldow]

would the 1900+ bottle neck that bad? i thought even with a slow processor he should be hitting 14000 on 3dmark. i have my ti 4200 o/c to the hilt and get 13412. he should still blow my doors with that card even if he is running a slow cpu, shouldn't he?

my ti 4200

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=5400709

[nunez1980]

would the 1900+ bottle neck that bad? i thought even with a slow processor he should be hitting 14000 on 3dmark. i have my ti 4200 o/c to the hilt and get 13412. he should still blow my doors with that card even if he is running a slow cpu, shouldn't he?

thats not totally true, before I had a 2200+ and could reach 15k, but that was overclock, cpu has a big deal when dealing with scores, if he puts the candy to the max, it will wipe the floor with your system, because the video will do more work, but the cpu is still hold it back;) and remember 3dmark doesn't mean jack, if you could play your games leave benchmarks alone, do you enjoy watching 3dmark:p

[ElroyCarbon]

I have done extensive benchmarking with both AMD and Intel and have found this to be VERY accurate. I found that on the Intel based systems with default settings you can expect round 300 Pts per 100 MHZ. Do not recall for the AMD, but with there scale and all I would have to say more than 300 pts per 100 MHZ. CYA!

[wildbilly2k]

alright i just direct x 8.1 installed and catylist 2.5 will see if i get a better bench here

[wildbilly2k]

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=5486287

alright it got worse

[Rotary-Motion]

Originally posted by wildbilly2k
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=5486287

alright it got worse

Hi

In your sig it says 1900 xp but in your 3d mark it says 1600 ???

Also in your 3d mark it also says your 8x AGP is N/A ???

have you set it right? as other mobos like yours do read ok on the site saying 8x AGP !!!

just an observation.....

Thx...............

[wildbilly2k]

yes it is set to agp 8x i made sure and the 1900+ real clock speed is 1600mhz