Farleytron said:
I'm just confused why everyone is so adamant that 2 TECs can't be better at cooling water than a crummy radiator?? And actually, after looking at some other peltiers, I will probably purchase 2 76W 40X40 TECs simply because they are not much more expensive.
Do you guys honestly think that a room temperature cooled radiator is superior to 2 TECs? Can someone point me to a website-based that proves this point?
TEC's are awesome little devices. They pump heat from one side to the other, but at a great cost in efficiency. I've heard mentioned they're as low as 20% (or less) efficient.
Now the problem with building a pure TEC radiator is that you'll have a really difficult time in getting enough surface area meeting the water to extract it's heat. Radiators are built for air and can be any number of shapes, but to find a shape that's got both humongous water surface area
and a 40mm square area on the other side of it is a daunting task, even for engineering and R&D departments. Air works easily because it's a fluid (so to speak) that can be blasted all over whatever surface we decide using the brute force of a fan...not so easy with a 40mm square piece of ceramic.
You starting to get the idea? Even a small computer fan can push 30 cubic feet of air per minute, yet the TEC is still using the static 40mm square. It's not that the design of a radiator is more efficient, it's that it's cooling medium is easy to work with, pliable, and can "brute forced" with the cheapest of equipment, the lowly fan.
I had seen a web-page at one time, where two students used a TEC to cool a single processor with an HSF mounted on it, all hanging out the back of a computer.
The problem translating that idea to an Athlon is that that was a pII 300 processor, which drew almost as little wattage as the case fan did. Their processor still got pretty warm too.