• Welcome to Overclockers Forums! Join us to reply in threads, receive reduced ads, and to customize your site experience!

Official Canterwood Benches!

Overclockers is supported by our readers. When you click a link to make a purchase, we may earn a commission. Learn More.

batotman

Member
Joined
Dec 4, 2002
Location
Kansas
I got my new CPU mag today.

Alienware system w/Canterwood

3ghz HT 800FSB
1GB Corsair DDR400
Radeon 9800

3dmark2001SE - 16691
3dmark03 - 5601
PCMark 2002
CPU - 7103
Mem - 8921
HDD - 1213

Quake III
1024 x 768 - 305.8
1280 x 1024 - 285.2
1600 x 1200 - 235.4

UT2k3
1024 x 768 - 114.4
1280 x 1024 - 115
1600 x 1200 - 114.5

Hope this makes some happy!

BTW their online article says this is under NDA till April 15...oops

Added these for some comparison
Falcon NW system

Has 2 x WD Raptor 10,000 RPM SATA drives....sweet.

Barton 3000+
9800 Pro
1GB PC2700

3dmark2001 - 16642
3dmark2003 - 5513
UT 2k3-
1024 x 768 - 131.1
1280 x 1024 - 121.9
1600 x 1200 - 109.1
 
Granted my system is OCed, but I've scored higher on every one of those tests. And they're running a 9800 and a gig of DDR 400! I'd hoped it'd get into the 17,000's in 3DM01, with everything on stock. And if the rumors about the high FSB preventing major OCing are true, well, I think those scores just suck... a lot...
 
Amino said:
Granted my system is OCed, but I've scored higher on every one of those tests. And they're running a 9800 and a gig of DDR 400! I'd hoped it'd get into the 17,000's in 3DM01, with everything on stock. And if the rumors about the high FSB preventing major OCing are true, well, I think those scores just suck... a lot...

I thought they were low as well. Only posting the info I got so take it up with CPU mag....lol.
 
I posted in another forum about this also . i don't believe those scores are original. My old P4 2.4(100fsb) overclocked to 125fsb beats the PCMark2002 scores. At various review sites a P4 3.06 usually gets on an average of 7500 PCMarks.
 
Anybody else notice on the Intel system under the UT2K3 benchmarks, 1280x1024 scored higher then 1024x768?
 
if theese tests are true i aint buying the canterwood chipset when it comes out thats for sure, well not if theese are 100% procent true that is :) gb looks fine to me then.
 
Back