PDA

View Full Version : E0 stepped 1.8A Chips

NiTrO bOiE
05-21-03, 05:22 PM
Anyone get one of these chips yet? And how good are they at overclocking?

SL67B E0 Stepping 1.475 volts
jdmcnudgent
05-21-03, 05:31 PM
havent seen em, are they on intels site??
NookieN
05-21-03, 05:34 PM
I don't think you'd want one of those. They appear to be based on the Willamette core and have 0KB of L2 cache. Looks like a special application chip of some kind.

http://processorfinder.intel.com/scripts/details.asp?sSpec=SL67B&ProcFam=483&PkgType=ALL&SysBusSpd=ALL&CorSpd=5005
Albuquerque
05-21-03, 05:39 PM
That is one bizarre mofo of a chip:o I bet it still overclocks like a true northwood, only because it has absolutely NO cache. WTF would they use such a chip for? Something like that would probably run about the same speed as an old P2 333 or something.

If it was built on the 0.13 micron process, it would probably overclock to to 4ghz and still suck worse than a P3 500 :D
jdmcnudgent
05-21-03, 05:49 PM
Originally posted by Albuquerque
That is one bizarre mofo of a chip:o I bet it still overclocks like a true northwood, only because it has absolutely NO cache. WTF would they use such a chip for? Something like that would probably run about the same speed as an old P2 333 or something.

If it was built on the 0.13 micron process, it would probably overclock to to 4ghz and still suck worse than a P3 500 :D no it wont, because it has a willo core. avoid that like the plague.:cool:
pip
05-21-03, 06:04 PM
Originally posted by NookieN
I don't think you'd want one of those. They appear to be based on the Willamette core and have 0KB of L2 cache. Looks like a special application chip of some kind.


well it's definitely not a foster lol ( for those who don't know foster is a willamette P4 with 1MB l2 cache
NookieN
05-21-03, 06:13 PM
Originally posted by pip


well it's definitely not a foster lol ( for those who don't know foster is a willamette P4 with 1MB l2 cache

1MB L3, it still had only 256k L2.
NiTrO bOiE
05-21-03, 06:14 PM
Originally posted by NookieN
I don't think you'd want one of those. They appear to be based on the Willamette core and have 0KB of L2 cache. Looks like a special application chip of some kind.

http://processorfinder.intel.com/scripts/details.asp?sSpec=SL67B&ProcFam=483&PkgType=ALL&SysBusSpd=ALL&CorSpd=5005

Whoops, wasn't even looking at the cache. Was just scanning through the steppings and voltages.
pip
05-21-03, 06:35 PM
Originally posted by NookieN


1MB L3, it still had only 256k L2.

sorry mistype