dustybyrd
09-14-03, 03:29 PM
I have both of these power supplies and I have some preliminary results testing them each separately on both of my DUAL AMD Asus A7M266-D boards---please see sig below for details on both computers tested.
Remember these are preliminary and I would like to do a more thorough review for overclockers when I can find equipment to do overload tests.
Manufacturer Specifications:
Antec 550=
Maximum output=530 watts.
+/-3% load regulation.
3 year warranty.
$104 shipped from www.directron.com
3.3v=32A
5v=40A
12v=24A
At 3.3v=32A and 5v=40A, the power supply is rated at 18.5A on the 12v rail.
As stated here by Antec:
http://www.antec-inc.com/info_DIYArticle_true550spec.html
The power supply is capable of producing the maximum rated power on all rails, subject to the maximum power of the power supply.
Fortron 530=
Maximum output=510 watts.
+/-5% load regulation.
1 year warranty.
$80 shipped from www.newegg.com
3.3v=28A
5v=40A
12v=18A
At 3.3v=28A and 5v=40A, the power supply is still rated at 18A on the 12v rail.
The power supply is capable of producing the maximum rated power on all rails simultaneously.
Weight of power supplies (weighed on chemical scale in Biology lab):
Antec 550=
4.5 pounds or 2.02 Kgs
Fortron 530=
5 pounds or 2.3 Kgs
Noise of Power supplies (currently judged only by my honest ear):
(same results for both systems in sig)
Antec 550=
I hear almost no sound with very quiet, 92 mm and 80mm stock fans. Although these are temperature controlled fans, I have yet to hear them speed up to audible levels (i.e., not louder than 5 case fans). Load conditions also didn't affect fan speeds/sound levels, and it seems that high case temperatures and room temperatures do NOT induce very high RPM on the 92mm fan. The 92mm fan comes with a sensor that indicates rpm level, and it fluctuates between 1500 and 2000 RPM, below 2000 RPM, the fans are not audible above the slight noise of the 5, 80mm Panaflo L1A case fans.
Fortron 530=
I hear almost no sound with 2 very quiet, 80mm stock fans,
UNLESS the room temps exceed 85 degrees F at which point the case temp is then 95 degrees F. Then the fans speed up to airplane jet engine levels. Load conditions also didn't affect fan speeds/sound levels. NOTE: as long as case temps are below 95 degrees F or ~35C then the fans NEVER speed up as a result of load conditions, even with 2 prime 95's running and passmark burnin test running at the same time.
Temperature of air coming out of back of power supply:
(same results for both systems in sig)
Antec 550=
40-45C, with room temp=22-24C and case temp=27-29C
Fortron 530=
37-40C, with room temp=22-24C and case temp=27-29C
Voltages under no load, heavy load as measured with on board sensors (mbm and asus pc probe) and with a VOLTMETER:
Antec 550=
sig#1---mbm values over 24 hours or 2 X Prime 95, and reg. use:
3.3v=3.28-3.31
5v=4.97-5
12v=11.98-12.16
vcore cpu1=1.65-1.71 (avg.=1.67)
vcore cpu2=1.63-1.70 (avg.=1.66)
sig#1---voltmeter values under no load and 2 X Prime 95 + Passmark Burnin Test at the same time---(Values did not change as a result of load conditions)
5v=5.0 at ATX connector and Hard Drive Molex
12v=11.98 at CPU 4 pin connector and 12.01 at hard drive molex
sig#2---mbm values over 24 hours or 2 X Prime 95, and reg. use
3.3v=3.3-3.31
5v=4.97-5
12v=11.92-11.98
vcore cpu1=1.77-1.82 (avg.=1.8)
vcore cpu2=1.75-1.81 (avg.=1.8)
sig#2---voltmeter values under no load and 2 X Prime 95 + Passmark Burnin Test at the same time---(Values did not change as a result of load conditions)
5v=5.0 at ATX connector and Hard Drive Molex
12v=11.99 at CPU 4 pin connector and 12.02 at hard drive molex
Fortron 530=
sig#1---mbm values over 24 hours or 2 X Prime 95, and reg. use
3.3v=3.28-3.33
5v=4.97-5.03
12v=12.04-12.28
vcore cpu1=1.65-1.71 (avg.=1.66)
vcore cpu2=1.63-1.70 (avg.=1.66)
sig#1---voltmeter values under no load and 2 X Prime 95 + Passmark Burnin Test at the same time---(Values did not change as a result of load conditions)
5v=5.02 at ATX connector and Hard Drive Molex
12v=12.08 at CPU 4 pin connector and 12.14 at hard drive molex
sig#2---mbm values over 24 hours or 2 X Prime 95, and reg. use
3.3v=3.3-3.33
5v=4.97-5.02
12v=11.98-12.16
vcore cpu1=1.77-1.82 (avg.=1.8)
vcore cpu2=1.75-1.81 (avg.=1.8)
sig#2---voltmeter values under no load and 2 X Prime 95 + Passmark Burnin Test at the same time---(Values did not change as a result of load conditions)
5v=5.08 at ATX connector and Hard Drive Molex
12v=12.11 at CPU 4 pin connector and 12.15 at hard drive molex
The voltmeter readings didn't change more than 0.01 for the Fortron and they didn't fluctuate at all with the Antec. The mbm and Asus PC Probe readings were slightly more variable with the Fortron versus the Antec as a function of time, even if the average values were very similar, with both the vcore cpu voltages and line voltages.
I have estimated these power requirements for the computer in sig#1:
3.3v: ~16-18A for normal to maximum use or 50-60 watts total
4-6A motherboard (dual)
10A 8500le with two monitors
0.5A soundblaster 5.1 live
0.5A Ethernet Card
0.5A USB card
0.5A TV Card
0.5A PCI Raid Card
5v: ~15A-30A for normal to maximum use or 75 to 150 Watts
2-4A motherboard
8-16A 2x512mb
0.5A sound
0.5A ethernet
0.5 USB card
0.5A TV card
0.5A PCI Raid Card
2.4A for 3 Hard Drives
1.2A CDRW
1.2A DVDRW
0.8A Floppy
0.8A Zip Drive
0.5A USB printer
0.25A Keyboard
0.25A Mouse
12v: ~20-28A for normal to max use or 240 to 336 watts
0.3-0.6A Motherboard
2A for 10 System and Processor Fans
2-6A for 3 hard drives
0.8A for CDRW
1.1A for DVDRW
17A for both CPUs
That means in normal, low usage surfing etc..., I would use 20A on 12v, 16A on the 3.3v, and 15A on the 5v for a total of 365 watts.
And I figure in heavy load conditions like burning a dvd, cd, gaming, prime 95, all at the same time, that I would use 25-26A on the 12v, 18A on the 3.3v, and 30A on the 5v for a maximum total of 522 watts.
I figure I would be using 365-450 watts for normal everyday use, occassionally topping 500 watts.
For all these estimates, I used the specs on the components and for the cpu's used the AMD website's formula for calculating wattage at certain voltages and clockspeeds:
AMD's formula:
1.65v*41.4A*2100/1733 (for o/c'd factor)*1.25 (for efficiency of the psu factor)=~8.5A per cpu...17A's total
USE OF FORTRON 350 watt PSU for DUAL AMD at 2x 1.47Ghz:
I had to use a Fortron 350 on a NON-OVERCLOCKED and NON-OVERVOLTED sig#2 computer before I received the Antec.
At that time, it was not pin-modded for more voltage, so at stock speeds 1.47ghz for each cpu (1700's), I calculated the 12v consumption at ~5A per cpu or 10-11A total on the 12v line. With the other components in the system, that would mean the 12v load on the system was 12A-16A.
I checked the voltages with a voltmeter under load and no load:
Fortron 350:
12v=11.5-11.7, load-no load (mbm reads 11.54-11.7)
5v=5
3.3=3.3
So the 12v consumption of this machine was 12-16A's and the power supply appeared overloaded with that and/or in combination with ~375-400 watts of the total system max power.
I then tried to overclock without the voltage increase and it would reboot even at 1.6ghz. But Lonely Raven (who I bought the system from) ran it all the time at 1.62ghz without voltage increases (same board and ram...just with an Enermax 650 power supply). This indicates that the 12v or max power of the fortron 350 was not enough for 2 cpu’s at 1.6ghz on this dual system.
Conclusions and thoughts about both the Antec TP 550 and Fortron 530:
1) I believe that the reason the Fortron 530 weighs more is because of the two very large heat sinks inside. The Antec TP 550 probably doesn't need as large of heat sinks because of the larger, 92mm intake fan versus the 80mm intake fan on the Fortron.
EDGE: Neither...as it's hard to say if it makes a difference.
2) I believe the noise level of the two power supplies is nearly identical under heavy load conditions in normal 70-80 degree working environments. However, I believe the Antec is quieter in high temperature (above 85 F room temperature) conditions. You probably could modify this in the Fortron by removing the thermal regulation of the fan speeds.
EDGE: Antec, because with no modifications it's quieter in high temperature conditions.
3) I believe the total wattage capacities overall and on the 12v lines to be very similar because voltages do not drop even under intense loads of 2 Instances of Prime 95 plus Passmark Burnin test with 2x2.1ghz processors at 1.8v. Both PSU's have immense power capacities. Based on the software read voltages, which must be taken with a grain of salt, I would say that the Antec has tighter rail regulation on the voltage lines. The difference between the two, however, is very very slight and neither vary directly with load conditions. The Antec is within +/-1.5% on all rails and the Fortron is within +/-2% on all rails. The voltages, however, did not vary with a voltmeter, but it's possible that the voltmeter is not as capable to determine faster voltage fluctuations as the on board sensors.
EDGE: Two close to call as both are much better than Intel/AMD requirements of +/-5% voltages with load regulation with a voltmeter and it is unclear if the difference between the software read voltages are meaningful.
Final Thoughts:
Neither of my dual systems requires enough power to actually overload the Antec TP 550 nor the Fortron 530 power supplies. Therefore, it is unclear which power supply is capable of more total output from all rails. It is also unclear if the 24A versus 18A rating on the 12v rail of the Antec versus the Fortron is relevant. But what is clear based on the possible 12v requirement of my systems is that the 12v 18A rating on the Fortron 530 seems to be an underestimate. The cpu’s ALONE in both my dual systems require about 18A on the 12v line, leaving little room for any other 12v consumption. However, I can use the DVDRW, CDRW, and all 3 hard drives at the same time without problems, and these devices add between 4-7A’s on the 12v rail.
Also, since both power supplies had better than +/-3% load regulation on all rails, either power supply should be an excellent choice for overclocking stability.
I believe the final edge goes to the Antec for the quieter function under high temperature conditions and the 3 year warranty. However, as far as raw and stable power, there is no clear winner that can be proven with my tests.
In summary, I like them both, and I prefer the Antec only when in high temperature conditions (above 85 F room temperature). Antec's 3 year warranty is also comforting. However, if cost is a consideration, the Fortron is $24 cheaper.
Remember these are preliminary and I would like to do a more thorough review for overclockers when I can find equipment to do overload tests.
Manufacturer Specifications:
Antec 550=
Maximum output=530 watts.
+/-3% load regulation.
3 year warranty.
$104 shipped from www.directron.com
3.3v=32A
5v=40A
12v=24A
At 3.3v=32A and 5v=40A, the power supply is rated at 18.5A on the 12v rail.
As stated here by Antec:
http://www.antec-inc.com/info_DIYArticle_true550spec.html
The power supply is capable of producing the maximum rated power on all rails, subject to the maximum power of the power supply.
Fortron 530=
Maximum output=510 watts.
+/-5% load regulation.
1 year warranty.
$80 shipped from www.newegg.com
3.3v=28A
5v=40A
12v=18A
At 3.3v=28A and 5v=40A, the power supply is still rated at 18A on the 12v rail.
The power supply is capable of producing the maximum rated power on all rails simultaneously.
Weight of power supplies (weighed on chemical scale in Biology lab):
Antec 550=
4.5 pounds or 2.02 Kgs
Fortron 530=
5 pounds or 2.3 Kgs
Noise of Power supplies (currently judged only by my honest ear):
(same results for both systems in sig)
Antec 550=
I hear almost no sound with very quiet, 92 mm and 80mm stock fans. Although these are temperature controlled fans, I have yet to hear them speed up to audible levels (i.e., not louder than 5 case fans). Load conditions also didn't affect fan speeds/sound levels, and it seems that high case temperatures and room temperatures do NOT induce very high RPM on the 92mm fan. The 92mm fan comes with a sensor that indicates rpm level, and it fluctuates between 1500 and 2000 RPM, below 2000 RPM, the fans are not audible above the slight noise of the 5, 80mm Panaflo L1A case fans.
Fortron 530=
I hear almost no sound with 2 very quiet, 80mm stock fans,
UNLESS the room temps exceed 85 degrees F at which point the case temp is then 95 degrees F. Then the fans speed up to airplane jet engine levels. Load conditions also didn't affect fan speeds/sound levels. NOTE: as long as case temps are below 95 degrees F or ~35C then the fans NEVER speed up as a result of load conditions, even with 2 prime 95's running and passmark burnin test running at the same time.
Temperature of air coming out of back of power supply:
(same results for both systems in sig)
Antec 550=
40-45C, with room temp=22-24C and case temp=27-29C
Fortron 530=
37-40C, with room temp=22-24C and case temp=27-29C
Voltages under no load, heavy load as measured with on board sensors (mbm and asus pc probe) and with a VOLTMETER:
Antec 550=
sig#1---mbm values over 24 hours or 2 X Prime 95, and reg. use:
3.3v=3.28-3.31
5v=4.97-5
12v=11.98-12.16
vcore cpu1=1.65-1.71 (avg.=1.67)
vcore cpu2=1.63-1.70 (avg.=1.66)
sig#1---voltmeter values under no load and 2 X Prime 95 + Passmark Burnin Test at the same time---(Values did not change as a result of load conditions)
5v=5.0 at ATX connector and Hard Drive Molex
12v=11.98 at CPU 4 pin connector and 12.01 at hard drive molex
sig#2---mbm values over 24 hours or 2 X Prime 95, and reg. use
3.3v=3.3-3.31
5v=4.97-5
12v=11.92-11.98
vcore cpu1=1.77-1.82 (avg.=1.8)
vcore cpu2=1.75-1.81 (avg.=1.8)
sig#2---voltmeter values under no load and 2 X Prime 95 + Passmark Burnin Test at the same time---(Values did not change as a result of load conditions)
5v=5.0 at ATX connector and Hard Drive Molex
12v=11.99 at CPU 4 pin connector and 12.02 at hard drive molex
Fortron 530=
sig#1---mbm values over 24 hours or 2 X Prime 95, and reg. use
3.3v=3.28-3.33
5v=4.97-5.03
12v=12.04-12.28
vcore cpu1=1.65-1.71 (avg.=1.66)
vcore cpu2=1.63-1.70 (avg.=1.66)
sig#1---voltmeter values under no load and 2 X Prime 95 + Passmark Burnin Test at the same time---(Values did not change as a result of load conditions)
5v=5.02 at ATX connector and Hard Drive Molex
12v=12.08 at CPU 4 pin connector and 12.14 at hard drive molex
sig#2---mbm values over 24 hours or 2 X Prime 95, and reg. use
3.3v=3.3-3.33
5v=4.97-5.02
12v=11.98-12.16
vcore cpu1=1.77-1.82 (avg.=1.8)
vcore cpu2=1.75-1.81 (avg.=1.8)
sig#2---voltmeter values under no load and 2 X Prime 95 + Passmark Burnin Test at the same time---(Values did not change as a result of load conditions)
5v=5.08 at ATX connector and Hard Drive Molex
12v=12.11 at CPU 4 pin connector and 12.15 at hard drive molex
The voltmeter readings didn't change more than 0.01 for the Fortron and they didn't fluctuate at all with the Antec. The mbm and Asus PC Probe readings were slightly more variable with the Fortron versus the Antec as a function of time, even if the average values were very similar, with both the vcore cpu voltages and line voltages.
I have estimated these power requirements for the computer in sig#1:
3.3v: ~16-18A for normal to maximum use or 50-60 watts total
4-6A motherboard (dual)
10A 8500le with two monitors
0.5A soundblaster 5.1 live
0.5A Ethernet Card
0.5A USB card
0.5A TV Card
0.5A PCI Raid Card
5v: ~15A-30A for normal to maximum use or 75 to 150 Watts
2-4A motherboard
8-16A 2x512mb
0.5A sound
0.5A ethernet
0.5 USB card
0.5A TV card
0.5A PCI Raid Card
2.4A for 3 Hard Drives
1.2A CDRW
1.2A DVDRW
0.8A Floppy
0.8A Zip Drive
0.5A USB printer
0.25A Keyboard
0.25A Mouse
12v: ~20-28A for normal to max use or 240 to 336 watts
0.3-0.6A Motherboard
2A for 10 System and Processor Fans
2-6A for 3 hard drives
0.8A for CDRW
1.1A for DVDRW
17A for both CPUs
That means in normal, low usage surfing etc..., I would use 20A on 12v, 16A on the 3.3v, and 15A on the 5v for a total of 365 watts.
And I figure in heavy load conditions like burning a dvd, cd, gaming, prime 95, all at the same time, that I would use 25-26A on the 12v, 18A on the 3.3v, and 30A on the 5v for a maximum total of 522 watts.
I figure I would be using 365-450 watts for normal everyday use, occassionally topping 500 watts.
For all these estimates, I used the specs on the components and for the cpu's used the AMD website's formula for calculating wattage at certain voltages and clockspeeds:
AMD's formula:
1.65v*41.4A*2100/1733 (for o/c'd factor)*1.25 (for efficiency of the psu factor)=~8.5A per cpu...17A's total
USE OF FORTRON 350 watt PSU for DUAL AMD at 2x 1.47Ghz:
I had to use a Fortron 350 on a NON-OVERCLOCKED and NON-OVERVOLTED sig#2 computer before I received the Antec.
At that time, it was not pin-modded for more voltage, so at stock speeds 1.47ghz for each cpu (1700's), I calculated the 12v consumption at ~5A per cpu or 10-11A total on the 12v line. With the other components in the system, that would mean the 12v load on the system was 12A-16A.
I checked the voltages with a voltmeter under load and no load:
Fortron 350:
12v=11.5-11.7, load-no load (mbm reads 11.54-11.7)
5v=5
3.3=3.3
So the 12v consumption of this machine was 12-16A's and the power supply appeared overloaded with that and/or in combination with ~375-400 watts of the total system max power.
I then tried to overclock without the voltage increase and it would reboot even at 1.6ghz. But Lonely Raven (who I bought the system from) ran it all the time at 1.62ghz without voltage increases (same board and ram...just with an Enermax 650 power supply). This indicates that the 12v or max power of the fortron 350 was not enough for 2 cpu’s at 1.6ghz on this dual system.
Conclusions and thoughts about both the Antec TP 550 and Fortron 530:
1) I believe that the reason the Fortron 530 weighs more is because of the two very large heat sinks inside. The Antec TP 550 probably doesn't need as large of heat sinks because of the larger, 92mm intake fan versus the 80mm intake fan on the Fortron.
EDGE: Neither...as it's hard to say if it makes a difference.
2) I believe the noise level of the two power supplies is nearly identical under heavy load conditions in normal 70-80 degree working environments. However, I believe the Antec is quieter in high temperature (above 85 F room temperature) conditions. You probably could modify this in the Fortron by removing the thermal regulation of the fan speeds.
EDGE: Antec, because with no modifications it's quieter in high temperature conditions.
3) I believe the total wattage capacities overall and on the 12v lines to be very similar because voltages do not drop even under intense loads of 2 Instances of Prime 95 plus Passmark Burnin test with 2x2.1ghz processors at 1.8v. Both PSU's have immense power capacities. Based on the software read voltages, which must be taken with a grain of salt, I would say that the Antec has tighter rail regulation on the voltage lines. The difference between the two, however, is very very slight and neither vary directly with load conditions. The Antec is within +/-1.5% on all rails and the Fortron is within +/-2% on all rails. The voltages, however, did not vary with a voltmeter, but it's possible that the voltmeter is not as capable to determine faster voltage fluctuations as the on board sensors.
EDGE: Two close to call as both are much better than Intel/AMD requirements of +/-5% voltages with load regulation with a voltmeter and it is unclear if the difference between the software read voltages are meaningful.
Final Thoughts:
Neither of my dual systems requires enough power to actually overload the Antec TP 550 nor the Fortron 530 power supplies. Therefore, it is unclear which power supply is capable of more total output from all rails. It is also unclear if the 24A versus 18A rating on the 12v rail of the Antec versus the Fortron is relevant. But what is clear based on the possible 12v requirement of my systems is that the 12v 18A rating on the Fortron 530 seems to be an underestimate. The cpu’s ALONE in both my dual systems require about 18A on the 12v line, leaving little room for any other 12v consumption. However, I can use the DVDRW, CDRW, and all 3 hard drives at the same time without problems, and these devices add between 4-7A’s on the 12v rail.
Also, since both power supplies had better than +/-3% load regulation on all rails, either power supply should be an excellent choice for overclocking stability.
I believe the final edge goes to the Antec for the quieter function under high temperature conditions and the 3 year warranty. However, as far as raw and stable power, there is no clear winner that can be proven with my tests.
In summary, I like them both, and I prefer the Antec only when in high temperature conditions (above 85 F room temperature). Antec's 3 year warranty is also comforting. However, if cost is a consideration, the Fortron is $24 cheaper.