Welcome to Overclockers Forums! Join us to reply in threads, receive reduced ads, and to customize your site experience!
The HyperX 3200 non A is a BH5 module, and a good one. But you should get the HyperX 3000 instead, it is also BH5 and a whole lot cheaper. Or just get the Buffalo, it's very nearly as good. Getting HyperX 3200A or 3500 will just get you CH5 chips and cost a forturne.Clutch_Head said:for AMD i'd say the Kingston (not the 3200A), and for Intel i'd have to vote for the BH-5 modules.
That is the memory. That is exactly where BH5's make the difference. The 5:4 would work fine.Clutch_Head said:
i think my HyperX memory has CH-5 chips (darn heatspreaders ). it passes memtest using 1:1 CPU/Memory @ 236 2-5-3-2 3.01v, but fails at or above 5:4 ratio @ 289:231 2-5-3-2 3.01v . its not the cpu because i it passes @ 3:2 289/192. dunno if its a memory issue or a mobo problem.
Clutch_Head said:
pass @ 5:4 297/230 2-5-3-2 3.01v
it passes 297/230 with GAT set to street racer (F1 failed), auto, auto, dis, dis.
OSFP said:I dont understand, you are talking about 190-200 FSB...thats OK for a PC3000 module, but since it has BH-5 chips , shouldnt it hit 230+ FSB?
The mushkins with BH5 hit that, and i thought only the chips matter in ram modules...nothing else, am i mistaken?