DeathMonk
10-21-03, 08:53 AM
Here goes my first post:
My setup:
A64 3200+
Asus K8V
512MB Corsair XMS PC3700
R9800 Pro
120Gb SATA Barracuda HDD
Zalman CNPS7000-Cu
I got it to 2.1 stable by just changing the FSB to 210--nothing else, no voltage, no memory settings, etc.
When I read this:
http://www.overclockers.com/tips00457/
I really don't get what he's saying by knocking down the memory to 333Mhz then getting a multiplier of 12..
I tried it anyway. I set the mem to 333mhz (5:3) then the fsb to 220mhz. Then tried with VCORE offset of 100mv. Froze in 3dmark quickly. Then I tried 200mv... Got a lot further, but still no luck. I havent tried 300mv because I still don't really know what i'm doing. I can't find anywhere in this bios to change the VCORE besides the "VCORE Offset" (or is this the same?).
I also didn't mess with agp or v-link voltage (what the hell is v-link voltage?)--don't know if I need to do this.
Lastly, tbreak's infamous "AMD 64 3200+ is here" thread shows 3d mark 01 scores of 24000+ @ 2.2 and an overclocked radeon.. On the second page he shows the stock A64 and stock radeon 3d mark score and it was like 20000.. I get 19008 at stock speeds. At any rate, this was another question that I had.. How are these scores 1000 off? The only difference would be RAM latency and motherboard.
My setup:
A64 3200+
Asus K8V
512MB Corsair XMS PC3700
R9800 Pro
120Gb SATA Barracuda HDD
Zalman CNPS7000-Cu
I got it to 2.1 stable by just changing the FSB to 210--nothing else, no voltage, no memory settings, etc.
When I read this:
http://www.overclockers.com/tips00457/
I really don't get what he's saying by knocking down the memory to 333Mhz then getting a multiplier of 12..
I tried it anyway. I set the mem to 333mhz (5:3) then the fsb to 220mhz. Then tried with VCORE offset of 100mv. Froze in 3dmark quickly. Then I tried 200mv... Got a lot further, but still no luck. I havent tried 300mv because I still don't really know what i'm doing. I can't find anywhere in this bios to change the VCORE besides the "VCORE Offset" (or is this the same?).
I also didn't mess with agp or v-link voltage (what the hell is v-link voltage?)--don't know if I need to do this.
Lastly, tbreak's infamous "AMD 64 3200+ is here" thread shows 3d mark 01 scores of 24000+ @ 2.2 and an overclocked radeon.. On the second page he shows the stock A64 and stock radeon 3d mark score and it was like 20000.. I get 19008 at stock speeds. At any rate, this was another question that I had.. How are these scores 1000 off? The only difference would be RAM latency and motherboard.