PDA

View Full Version : 3DMark2001 SE result


Supermachoman
11-09-03, 01:04 AM
These results were attained with the stock drivers. How much of an increase would I potentially see by switching to the catalyst drivers? Are they safe to use? If so, which one is the "best", 3.6, 3.7, 3.8?

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=7206457

Thanks guys.

Overclocker550
11-09-03, 08:41 PM
whatever you do, dont use the 3.8! also overclock your video card if you want 21k

nimrod0031
11-10-03, 03:21 PM
best combo for 2k1 seems to be dx8.1 and the 3.2 cats for me:)

iamnoob
11-13-03, 12:57 AM
Catalsyt 3.6's worked the best for me, but i havent really noticed much of a difference from 3.7-3.9

Pretty much the same scores for me in each of those drivers...

f00t
11-13-03, 06:59 AM
Originally posted by nimrod0031
best combo for 2k1 seems to be dx8.1 and the 3.2 cats for me:)

same here, no matter what driver I use, the 3.2s always nd up giving me a couple extra hunderd points

Mr_H
11-13-03, 10:28 AM
I prefer to use customized drivers from Omega... I run a 9500 Non-Pro and was just able to score 18,576 with stock cooling.

StormPC
11-13-03, 06:00 PM
Originally posted by Overclocker550
whatever you do, dont use the 3.8! also overclock your video card if you want 21k

I use the 3.8's and they work ok, but I'm switching to 3.9's tonight. I have a feeling that the 3.8's don't allow overclocking of the CPU as high as the other drivers.

Bobtod
11-13-03, 06:54 PM
same as nimrod0031 suggested, 3.2's everytime for me. Get that XT overclocked man!!

BT