- Joined
- Dec 17, 2000
Anyone know how the RBX Block does?
http://www.dangerden.com/mall/Blocks/rbx.asp
Looks very simular to the whitewaters block
http://www.dangerden.com/mall/Blocks/rbx.asp
Looks very simular to the whitewaters block
-
Welcome to Overclockers Forums! Join us to reply in threads, receive reduced ads, and to customize your site experience!
Danger Den waterblocks
- Thread starter JaY_III
- Start date
- Joined
- Nov 18, 2003
i too am wondering how the RBX performs, but i searched for "RBX" and got nothing useful.
on another note, i emailed dangerden and they said coppertops will be available starting monday
edit: i thought i had seen a rather lengthy post, but for some reason it didn't show in my search. you can find it here.
on another note, i emailed dangerden and they said coppertops will be available starting monday
edit: i thought i had seen a rather lengthy post, but for some reason it didn't show in my search. you can find it here.
Last edited:
- Joined
- Nov 13, 2003
- Location
- Westminster, CA
The White Water and Evo are both good blocks. Have you thought about them? I haven't seen any performance test on the RBX yet so I can't say anything. But the WW is one of the best plus their base problem is "supposedly" solved by now.
- Joined
- Nov 18, 2003
i only see brass tops for the P4 and reg AMD. theres a copper top for the Athalon 64/Opertron, but everything else has brass. i want a copper top!!!!
also theres a link on dangerdens homepage about a review. its in norwegian, but theres also a link to a graph that says it performed better than the white water. could be sketchy though...
also theres a link on dangerdens homepage about a review. its in norwegian, but theres also a link to a graph that says it performed better than the white water. could be sketchy though...
- Joined
- Oct 12, 2001
- Location
- Los Angeles
Ha, that is a funny graph. Most would argue that the Maze 3 outperforms the Maze 4 and the WW outperforms the Maze 3 by roughly 6C. Now how could it be that the Maze 4 (in that test) is only 1C behind the WW.zip22 said:
- Joined
- Jun 27, 2002
- Location
- NL, Europe
jAY said:
We'll have to wait for Joe C. to test the other competitors too, however. I guess that the DTEK WW will be tested sometime, but the original Cathar WW probably not... and what about the Cascade?
OP
- Joined
- Dec 17, 2000
- Thread Starter
- #13
FIZZ3 said:
I think the heatsink database is something we all take for granted.
I never knew how much i loved it untill looking for waterblocks.
I cant wait till the waterblock database grows....
Would still like to see some classic blocks in it to see how much they have improved over time.
- Joined
- Jun 27, 2002
- Location
- NL, Europe
jAY said:
Yeah, especially when all there is otherwise is a handful of flawed reviews with scattered blocks in wildly differing situations. If you want to be more certain about a block's performance, you'll have to play the waiting game. Luckily, waterblocks don't age *that* quickly and most people can hold out with an old heatsink in the mean time.
OP
- Joined
- Dec 17, 2000
- Thread Starter
- #15
