- Joined
- Dec 17, 2000
Anyone know how the RBX Block does?
http://www.dangerden.com/mall/Blocks/rbx.asp
Looks very simular to the whitewaters block
http://www.dangerden.com/mall/Blocks/rbx.asp
Looks very simular to the whitewaters block
Welcome to Overclockers Forums! Join us to reply in threads, receive reduced ads, and to customize your site experience!
Ha, that is a funny graph. Most would argue that the Maze 3 outperforms the Maze 4 and the WW outperforms the Maze 3 by roughly 6C. Now how could it be that the Maze 4 (in that test) is only 1C behind the WW.zip22 said:also theres a link on dangerdens homepage about a review. its in norwegian, but theres also a link to a graph that says it performed better than the white water. could be sketchy though...
jAY said:whoops i ment to say brass...
Looks like Joe is doing a review on this block with his new tester...
Looks like everyone is goning to have some SOILD numbers to look at
FIZZ3 said:
We'll have to wait for Joe C. to test the other competitors too, however. I guess that the DTEK WW will be tested sometime, but the original Cathar WW probably not... and what about the Cascade?
jAY said:
I think the heatsink database is something we all take for granted.
I never knew how much i loved it untill looking for waterblocks.
I cant wait till the waterblock database grows....
Would still like to see some classic blocks in it to see how much they have improved over time.