View Full Version : burning in at default speed?
ive been reading a couple of threads about burning in and lots of peopl burn in at default speed at high voltages i was always told get your cpu as high as it will go then burn it in at high voltages.witch is the proper way please clear this up for me as i am burning in right now at 950 at 1.9v.witch method has a better effect thnx lucky
It's best to start a little higher than default then gradually move up until instability occurs. Then drop it back down a bit and burn in more until you can get to that previous cut-off point.
Burning in can take a couple months sometimes. My Celeron 533a@840 took over a month and then I was able to get that at default voltage.
I would say that there are two types of burning in, the first is with high temps, I would guess that this just bonds the thermal paste a little better to the heatsink, from what I have read this is best done for only a few seconds with the fan off, the second is where you run at low temp's with high voltage, I read an article on this that explains how it is supposed to affect the transistors (I forget where it was) I would have to agree with this as after running my chip at default speed/high voltage I was able to lower my voltage when overclocked and run at higher overclocks, I would recomend you set the speed backt to 566 with either 1.9 or 2v which ever you are most confident with and then let it run seti and prime95, I also use sandra burn in wizard when I am not at the computer, unfortunately sandra takes control of the computer so you can't run it when you want to use the computer
Thanks for the replys guys it is good to have different oppinions.
vBulletin® v3.8.7, Copyright ©2000-2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.