PDA

View Full Version : HT/NT Service Oddities - Help?


Enkidu
01-11-04, 11:48 AM
I've been messing with this problem for a few weeks now and am at a loss, hoping one of you seti masters have seen it before and can help :-)

Here is the deal - I have several P4 HT machines, I have them each running 2 seti clients, one at c:\seti and the other at c:\seti\ht I also have them configured as services using the nt toolkit (instsrv and srvany, which in turn uses registry entries to configure them).

The problem: At least 3 times a week I'll notice a slow down with 'one' of the two WUs running on these machines. When I go investigate I can see (using taskmgr) that while one of the virtual processors is pegged at 100%, the other is not - leaving the machine running at around 85% cpu load. If I play with stopping and restarting the seti services I can get get them both to max out. These machines are used during the days, but seti does run 24/7.

Has anyone seen this before? I'm at a loss for how to fix this problem. I really don't like instsrv and srv any - I'd rather use the "Seti@Home Service" that lets you use a web browser to check their stats - but it doesnt play well with HT (you can't install 2 instances of the service). Any ideas? Is there a better service utility I should be using?

Thanks!
Enk

Steven4563
01-11-04, 11:53 AM
has somone got something running on the comp thats using 15% off cpu power ?? or anything like that

Enkidu
01-11-04, 04:47 PM
nope no obvious things. I have left them totally unused for a few days to test and they still end up hung.

Enkidu
01-12-04, 05:09 PM
*bump* Anyone at all seen these problems ever - or do your instsrv/srvany seti processes park at 100% cpu 24/7 ?

eaglescouter
01-13-04, 12:45 AM
Does it make a difference if you bump the priority up one notch?

Enkidu
01-13-04, 11:44 AM
All I've read says service priority is virtually meaningless to SETI, but will give that a shot. Seems like most other people run fine without any priority adjustments so I'm thinking it must be something else.

Any other ideas from anyone?

gusgizmo
01-13-04, 09:27 PM
what SAH client version and caching program are you using?

edit: nm i see. has it decreased your WU output any? sorry i cant be of more help, i have no experience with running seti as a service.

Enkidu
01-13-04, 11:19 PM
running 3.03 CLI - which hits a SetiQueue machine on the network. When one of the processes "hang" it does indeed slow down wu output. And please don't apologize, any thoughts are appreciated - I've about given up any hope :-(