View Full Version : HAHAHA CELERON II 700 @ 1GHZ!!! cC0
Carmine_Paterno
03-03-01, 06:54 AM
Yea you heard me!! After this long awaited time i finally got my GOOD OLD CELEY 700 to 1ghz. I am installing win2k on 1 of my 2 10 gb hard drives. When it is done, i will post the results. I am running it @ 2.0v. And to all you who said it was very unlikely to happen i hate to say it
BUT I TOLD U SOO HAHAHAHAHAHAA.
I knew this celeron had it in it! Can't wait to see quake3 with my radeon.
But i have one problem, the mobo seems there is a problem with it. My keyboard status lights keeps flahing once in a while. I think my ps/2 is screwed, but my usb microsoft intellimouse optical isn't lit either? Is my ports all scrrwed? This really blows cuz i finally got my chip up that high and my ports are all screwed thanX!!!
ABIT BF6 BEST MOBO OUT THERE
200mhz fsb 66-200 1 mhz increments
udma 33 but raid66 fastrak card coming over spring break
128mb pc133 (other 64mb won't fit, motherboard not as wide as p3v4x)
HAHAHAHAAH I LUV IT
Carmine_Paterno
03-03-01, 07:27 AM
I got rid of the mouse problem, i just had to wait for the driver to be intialized in win2k. Almost done installing, i didn't use smartdrive. (stupid stupid stupid) and i am downloading the newest sandra. I haven't updated the bios yet, maybe that will fix the keyboard problem. Works great. I gotta see the memory scores compared to my P3V4X.
Big freakin deal try a PIII 750 at 1GHZ 1.95v bub. Now thats funny :)[img="http://"]
WTG Carmine!!!
Glad to hear another forum member has made it to the magical 1 GHz plateau.
Keep tweakin, let us know how the Sandra scores are when you get it finalizied.
Well done.
Mr B
I still say that anything above a 633 celeron is ****e for overclocking, I have my 600 at 1008mhz and this will out perform you overlocked 700 any day as my memory is running at 112mhz, plus with the lower multiplyer chips even if you can't get a gig you still have what ever speed they run at on a 100mhz fsb.
Carmine_Paterno
03-03-01, 04:16 PM
Wait a min did i say 1ghz my bad, 1015mhz lol. that 15 mhz is pretty damn worth it with 2 more mhz fsb. I am @ 96 fsb right now @ 1015mhz. Life is good. I think i am going to have to reinstall tho. I seem to have installed a weird version of win2k, and it won't except my radeon. And i get really whacked out scores like 48,000+ on the cpu benchmark. That ain't right so i am gonna get the newest sisandra.
I am @ 2.2v right now.
Stable like a rock!
I would give your chip about a month at 2.2v unless you are using a peltier, even if it is kept really cool as I know a few people who have had chips running at around 2.1v which died real quick even though they weren't getting very hot
Carmine_Paterno
03-03-01, 04:50 PM
I think my celey will be just fine @ 2.2v as intel recommends that the highest you put it to is 2.1v by the way just for a reference point, they also said 80c was normal temps. I think 2.2v won't kill my chip, and i need 2.2 to get to 1015 and 2.1v to get to 1005. Thnx for looking out!
Has anyone had probelms with there ATI RADEON and the ABIT BF6?
I looked on my radeon box and it says it wants either 4x or 2x agp and agp 2.0 complaint. Does this mean i need agp 2.0 or it works with it? In this program i have, wpcuid it says i have agp 1.0. Will this cause a problem? Is this maybe why it doesn't reconize the card? It finds it then, when i install the drivers, reboots(normally), but i can only set screen to 800x600 and no games work. Wierd version win2k drivers, or mobo?
DocClock aka MadClocker
03-03-01, 05:06 PM
Hahaha..I have this thingy at 1087mhz @ 1.75v!
I just put it to 1.75 for insurance...after an hr of need for speed, temps were 29c cpu, 31c mobo...this pup has some real head room....here's a shot
Carmine_Paterno
03-03-01, 05:16 PM
Yo thatz really good, but no need to give me **** because that is a P3 and this is a celeron for the 1st day on a ABIT BF6.
Carmine_Paterno (Mar 03, 2001 04:50 p.m.):
I think my celey will be just fine @ 2.2v as intel recommends that the highest you put it to is 2.1v by the way just for a reference point, they also said 80c was normal temps. I think 2.2v won't kill my chip, and i need 2.2 to get to 1015 and 2.1v to get to 1005. Thnx for looking out!
Has anyone had probelms with there ATI RADEON and the ABIT BF6?
I looked on my radeon box and it says it wants either 4x or 2x agp and agp 2.0 complaint. Does this mean i need agp 2.0 or it works with it? In this program i have, wpcuid it says i have agp 1.0. Will this cause a problem? Is this maybe why it doesn't reconize the card? It finds it then, when i install the drivers, reboots(normally), but i can only set screen to 800x600 and no games work. Wierd version win2k drivers, or mobo?
AGP is backward compatable, so agp 2 cards will work in 1 slots, I have a tnt2u which is an agp2 card but runs fine in my agp 1 slot
Carmine_Paterno
03-03-01, 05:28 PM
Hey phil thanx lot for that! Now i know it was just the screwed up win2k. O right another 15 mins and i will be posting pictures. I think i am the first one to get past 1ghz on a Celeron II 700!!! That would be awesome!
I have seen a few people over at overclockers.com.au that have gotten 700's to over a gig, haven't looked on this sites db
Carmine_Paterno
03-03-01, 05:46 PM
O well!! I am just thrilled that i got mine to over 1 gig. Celeron ii 700's afre such a pain so i am really excited that i finally got it!!! 1st person or not, i am extremely happy with this chip and might buy another one with a ABIT VP6. Still thinking
Carmine_Paterno
03-03-01, 05:48 PM
I just looked on the overclockers.com.au webiste on the pc database and no one reached 1 gig. Only 997. O right I guess i am the first person to hitt 1ghz+ on the Celeron II 700!!!
Carmine,
For cryin out loud....you finally got rid of your VIA chipset, whaddy ya want to go get another for?!?!?
Now that you have a BX board, stay on it.....
Mr B
Carmine_Paterno
03-03-01, 08:04 PM
Very true mr. B very true. I am going to stick with my setup for a while. @ 1015 no games, reboots 1008 reboots and 1005 reboots, 997 goes to desktop. I need more voltage. Giving you benchmark scores in a lil bit. I don't think it is the cpu, i think it is my radeon drivers, i am using the first win2k drivers for it. Updating now!
DocClock aka MadClocker
03-03-01, 08:08 PM
Hey Carmine, I think good cooling or no..2.2v I think will kill your chip quick...sure it might goto some awesome speed for a breif while, and "electromigration" will start to occur...and it will either allow a higher clock with lower volts...or the chip will die a horrible death...if you decide to take the chance, then make sure you have a probe as close to the cpu as possible, and keep an active eye on it....with those kind of volts, expect realy sharp temperature increases, and be ready to hit the off sw.
Phil and Doc are VERY correct in that 2.2v will burn that chip up. Don't stay at that voltage for long. Get your rig stable, burn it a few days, and then start to drop that vcore a step at a time.
I loved the idea my Celeron 600 will run stable at 1053 (2.05v), but I like the idea it'll last longer at 1.95v at 1009.
WATCH THOSE TEMPS !!
Mr B
Carmine_Paterno
03-04-01, 05:11 AM
I am gonna keep my chip running @ 903 (85fsb) @ 1.7v (default) for just a little while. I am gonna burn in for maybe a week or so, get the voltages and temps down so maybe i can do 1015 @ 2.1v. If i could achieve that, i would do it, maybe even 2.05!
wild_andy_c
03-04-01, 05:20 AM
No - WE TOLD YOU SO
I'm the old cautious type. I thought 2.2v was just a little extreme too. But sometimes, ya just gotta push the limit and see what they'll clock, right? When you do your burn in at a lower speed, crank up the voltage to at least 1.9, I'm assuming you have good cooling if that chip was surviving at 2.2v.
Keep working on cooling solutions and tweaking at things. It'll be really "cool" and the chip will live longer if you could get it stable above 1 gig using no more than 2.0v, although personally, I prefer no more than 1.9v for long term. But, short term extreme overclocking...well, I sometimes push the limits too.
Carmine_Paterno
03-04-01, 11:34 AM
After a little bit of screwing around with it, the chip posts up to 1050 (100fsb) but starts to boot, and windows error. The fastest stable position, is 966 (2v) i can play games, do a stability test everything. Everything else doesn't run stability test program. Everything after 987 cannot play games reliably. Game i used was Quake3 on highest setting. I added 2 more fans to the heatsink.
So far my setup is 1 fan blowing in 2 fans blowing out. Runs 21C IDLE and 42C full load (2.3v 1015)
Carmine_Paterno (Mar 04, 2001 11:34 a.m.):
After a little bit of screwing around with it, the chip posts up to 1050 (100fsb) but starts to boot, and windows error. The fastest stable position, is 966 (2v) i can play games, do a stability test everything. Everything else doesn't run stability test program. Everything after 987 cannot play games reliably. Game i used was Quake3 on highest setting. I added 2 more fans to the heatsink.
So far my setup is 1 fan blowing in 2 fans blowing out. Runs 21C IDLE and 42C full load (2.3v 1015)
Let me see if I read this right.....
Runs......(2.3v...)
Are you serious?!?!?!
You're setting the vcore to 2.3!!!! Carmine, that's CPUicide!!!!
Lower that down or that Celeron won't live to see St Patrick's Day!!!! SERIOUSLY !!!
I'm not trying to **** in your Wheaties here, just would hate to read a post about a fried chip.
I'm also a bit curious how you added two more fans to the heatsink???? I'm assuming you meant you added fans to the case.
The Celeron core maxes at around the speeds you've gotten. You can push, but if it ain't gonna give, it just ain't gonna. If a chip goes higher than that, then that person is very fortunate. One of my celerons won't go past 945 no matter HOW MANY volts I put thru it.
Don't kill it....please don't.
Mr B
Carmine_Paterno
03-04-01, 02:49 PM
Don't worry, i was just setting it to that to see what the load was. It runs 1015 @ 2.1v now. It runs 966 @ 2v games and everything stable. Burning in everyday now to try to get to 997.
I need a 133fsb chip to maybe get to 175+fsb.
Carmine_Paterno (Mar 03, 2001 05:48 p.m.):
I just looked on the overclockers.com.au webiste on the pc database and no one reached 1 gig. Only 997. O right I guess i am the first person to hitt 1ghz+ on the Celeron II 700!!!
Don't know about the db but I have definately seen other people with chips running faster than yours, there are people on oc.com.au with them up to 1100mhz and I know I have read about people with 700 faster than 1ghz,
Carmine_Paterno (Mar 04, 2001 02:49 p.m.):
Don't worry, i was just setting it to that to see what the load was. It runs 1015 @ 2.1v now. It runs 966 @ 2v games and everything stable. Burning in everyday now to try to get to 997.
I need a 133fsb chip to maybe get to 175+fsb.
You don't want a 133 "EB" chip. they're even harder to o/c than that 700 Celeron you've already got.
Read all the posts in here concerning this, and you'll find that the "EB" line is not the way to go.
Faster default ratings do not equate to faster overclocking. By and large the higher the multiplier, and default FSB, the less the chip will o/c.
There are exceptions to the rule, but these chips are few and far between. Not all chips will hit a gig. If you look in the database for the 600 Celley, you'd think, "Wow, most of these chips will get to almost a gig."
But think of how many don't get listed there, because they're dogs, that won't reach 747 MHz. A lot more, I'd wager.
If the 700 celley WON'T hit 1000+ safely, don't kill it trying. Not every one will. It's not guarranteed that any chip will. Total absolute luck of the draw, unless you buy the chip "pre-tested" to run that fast. and then, chances are, that's exacty how fast that chip is gonna go, because if it went faster than what the person who pre-tested it says, wouldn't he know, and sell it for more $$??
Mr B
So what do i need to look for on a flipchip 700E to make sure it has the cCO. And do i need to get a socket 370 or socket 1 or does it matter I currently have a 733 Coppermine Can that even get up to a gig or do I need the 700E???
Default voltage spec printed on the chip. 1.7v default is the cC0, anything other is a cB0.
Opt for the FC-PGA "flip chip", as you can use it in either a s370 or slot 1 board (slot 1 with a slocket adapter).
Generally, the way to go is with the slot 1 mb, and the chip in a coppermine compatable slocket, that has provision for adjusting the core voltage.
The 700E is a well known overclocker. Because of the lower multiplier and the 100 FSB default, the chip has some headroom to work with, as opposed to the 700 Celeron, with it's 10.5x multi, which is really at the end of the core's capacity. A 566 or 600 Celeron is a better choice than the 733 for this reason.
The 700E would work well for you. I'm waiting on the mailman for my Alpha P3125 hsf to start playing w/ my P/// 600E (slot1)...I've had it post at 936 @ 1.9v w/ the intel hsf, but it got real hot quick, so I shut down and put the Celeron back in.
There you go....P/// 700E flip chip, or 566/600 Celeron.
Good luck.
Mr B
vBulletin® v3.8.7, Copyright ©2000-2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.