Raider84 said:
If you leave it running 24/7 it stays expanded and they is less wear.
The small amount of damage which may occur to a modern CPU from expansion and contraction is so minimal that it really is not appreciable from the standpoint of relative life.
Here's an apocryphal scenario:
standard CPU life expectancy when not overclocked:
15 years
amount of deterioration from expansion and contraction:
10%
Diminished life expectancy:
13.5 years
Now honestly, do you expect to still be using the same CPU 13.5 years from now?
Here's another way to look at it:
Average US electrical cost: 5 cents per kilowat hour
Average use of a CPU on standby: 20 watts
Approximate KW/H per day: 4
cost per day: 20 cents
per month: $6
per year: $72
over the average (diminished) life of the CPU: $972
Now if you look at my power rates, the cost is:
cost per day: 60 cents
per month: $18
per year $216
Now, for a new AMD XP CPU as of today:
2500+ Barton = $84.98 (at
www.mwave.com)
Looks like I can just about afford to buy a new processor every 4 months at my rate. You can just about afford a new one every year.
Keeping a computer running 24/7 to "save" the hardware does not make ECONOMIC sense. Now if you're folding, or doing SETI, or some other noble task, that's different...