View Full Version : which is cheeper waterchiller or TEC?
ailijic1985
02-04-04, 08:36 PM
I am looking for long term cost and initial cost. doesnt have to be exact just ballpark figures. with the chiller I would get make the unit myself not buy one of the premade ones. what are your opinions?
nealric
02-04-04, 09:15 PM
TEC is cheaper- especially if you can get a good deal on a power supply on ebay and cheap TECs- you might be able to do it for as low as $40-50.
Water chilling, however, will yeild MUCH better performance. My setup (excluding water cooling setupcost) cost me a little over $100.
Mustanley
02-05-04, 08:52 AM
TEC will also cost more money in the long run. They are much less efficient and will draw considerably more current than a phase change powered water chiller.
mojotim
02-12-04, 03:18 PM
A TEC will cost more long term, but short term its less and a little steathier.
vBulletin® v3.8.7, Copyright ©2000-2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.