CPU Math Mark Scores: Post Please

[Kramerica]

I was wondering how Intel chips stacked up to AMD's. Get mathmark here, and post your results:

http://www.tweakfiles.com/cgi-bin/dl-ftp.cgi?ftp.zdnet.com/threedee/tweakfiles/benchmark/CPUmathMark.exe

[Super]

Just today I bought an AMD 750 (duron I think) with 96MB ram, and I got total time of 73,643 sec.

I will post my Celeron 600@750 w/ 192MB ram tomorrow...

[Placid]

Total time=64.236
1091mhz p3. 256mb ram.

[Mr B]

76.993 seconds.

P///600E @ 918, 256 MB PC133

Mr B

[FrankMasterFlash]

Celeron 600@945
128MB Ram CAS 2-2-2
Windows 2k Pro.

73.135 seconds

[outhouse]

I'll raise the mark just a hair

57.945

[MAV]

Well, i've just run this test on my work computer,
PIII 800EB @ 800, 128meg ram, it's a compaq, got the following score : 106 seconds....he..he...he...smoking, would'nt you say....
regards

[MAV]

Well, i've just run this test on my work computer,
PIII 800EB @ 800, 128meg ram, it's a compaq, got the following score :
106 seconds ....he..he...he...smoking, would'nt you say....
regards

[MAV]

MAV (Jun 06, 2001 02:03 a.m.):
Well, i've just run this test on my work computer,
PIII 800EB @ 800, 128meg ram, it's a compaq, got the following score :
106 seconds ....he..he...he...smoking, would'nt you say....
regards

Apologies, it appears i double posted.....
regards

[Rainmaker]

69.25

[RC_Monet]

work computer, dell gx 110, 866EB, 512Meg. 83.26secs, mm, not that bad...

[ken257]

TBird running at 1605mhz 41.962 seconds

Anyine got a P4? I am curious how they stack up.

[Kramerica]

ken, that is kinda a strange score...my t-bird 1.2 ghz @ 1.44 ghz gets about 37 seconds. And the processor is the only good part in the system.

[Super]

Super (Jun 05, 2001 10:54 p.m.):
Just today I bought an AMD 750 (duron I think) with 96MB ram, and I got total time of 73,643 sec.

I will post my Celeron 600@750 w/ 192MB ram tomorrow...


the Celeron time was 97,923 sec

[burn'em]

Total Time 69.95

Compaq Presario 1800T Laptop
PIII 1ghz
196 ram
win 2000

[MAV]

O.K. my new PIII 1gig @ 1088 only gave me 74 sec's....not too good i'm afraid..

[Placid]

MAV (Jun 07, 2001 05:51 a.m.):
O.K. my new PIII 1gig @ 1088 only gave me 74 sec's....not too good i'm afraid..

The test is all cpu-memory. If you are running your memory at cas-3 thats probably why.

[MAV]

Placid (Jun 07, 2001 06:42 a.m.):
MAV (Jun 07, 2001 05:51 a.m.):
O.K. my new PIII 1gig @ 1088 only gave me 74 sec's....not too good i'm afraid..

The test is all cpu-memory. If you are running your memory at cas-3 thats probably why.

Actually, come to think of it, i think you're right, i'm running cas 3 mem..
regards

[outhouse]

besides running at cas 2 make sure you have 4 way interleave enabled, also there may be other settings in BIOS that you can tweak to get better benchmarks get sisandra and keep tweaking and running the memory benchmark until you cant get your scores any higher. goodluck

[Carmine_Paterno]

I got a score of 154 with my CYRIX III 600 @ 860 with a 107fsb. :((((((((

[ken257]

Kramerica (Jun 06, 2001 07:28 p.m.):
ken, that is kinda a strange score...my t-bird 1.2 ghz @ 1.44 ghz gets about 37 seconds. And the processor is the only good part in the system.

Your right it is a little strange. That score of 41.9 should be higher for 1605mhz. This was on a Asus A7V133. I did some more testing and droped the cpu in one of my Abit KT7A-R mobos. Since this test was done only with air cooling I could only run at 1500 and the score improved quite a bit now at 35 seconds! I also tested the cpu back on the Asus at 1500 to verify and the scores were even worse. This does not say much for th A7V133. I will have to look for a new bios update and see if the problem can be solved. The Abit boards always did feel a little snappier then the Asus A7V133 even with a lower clocked cpu.

[Sohryu Asuka Langley]

79 seconds
Celly700@875 (83Mhz of death)
224Mb SDR 125Mhz 2-2-2CL