160 pointer?

[BIB]

p858_p53dimer858 Gromac
i just finished one frame in 26 minutes.
one day and 18 hours to finish.

[SavageBasher]

Consider yourself lucky to have a fast cpu like that. From what I see, the deadline is only 8 days!!! :( I don't know if I can make that, I only have my pc on about 10 hours a day, and my first frame took 1 hour 20 minutes. :eek:

[belorsch]

Big one. What does the PPW calculate out too?

[nut581]

just got this too ... 1 day and 17 hrs :) ...

[BIB]

PPW 619.91

[Maxvla]

just got this on one of my HT's for one of my 2.6c's. gonna take about 49 hours, but ppw is still pretty good at 520ppw plus the other HT is doing 400ppw on a crappy 33 pointer.

[Tismedt]

I just opened EMIII and woah I've got three of em. As soon as EM puts up some numbers for frame times I'll let you guys know. This are all on AMDs (2800@2250, 1800@1906 & 1700 pali stock)

Oh and there are two of em. P859_53dimer859 = 160 points

That makes four 160 pointers. Don't know yet if I like that???????

[Tismedt]

Oops EMIII Screen Shot will be up soon.

[UberBlue]

160's must of been on sale at Wal-Mart.

I've got one too.

[Maxvla]

Originally posted by Tismedt
EMIII Screen Shot
wow. your production tomorrow is gonna suck! heh... but 2 days from now it will rock :)

[Tismedt]

Yea I'm doin a little figuring and it looks like these will complete in about the same amount of time as 3 1/2 p520 33 pointers. Thats about a 50 point increase. But :eek: 42 hrs to complete.

[gungeek]

I have a P859 that just started on 2 machines. Yes, tomorrows production numbers aren't going to be pretty, but Saturday's going to be a fine day:) One rig has completed 3 steps at 22 minutes per step (AMD XP@ 2.3GHz); that's 37 hours.....wow.

[Tawcan]

Got one on my machine as well...I was just wondering why it only completed like 6 frames since this afternoon...:o

[Tismedt]

OK heres the screenie. Man that 1700 pali is slooww on this wu. I checked and its got the sse boost and the latest core. Wonder wtf

[UberBlue]

It's all relative. If everybody gets hammered by these, then everybody stats are gonna suck.

ACK! I just got another one...

[Papsomax]

Yes I have 2 of those. One on my PIV 2.8:
+ Processing work unit
[03:18:45] Core required: FahCore_78.exe
[03:18:45] Core found.
[03:18:45] Working on Unit 09 [March 19 03:18:45]
[03:18:45] + Working ...
[03:18:46]
[03:18:46] *------------------------------*
[03:18:46] Folding@home Gromacs Core
[03:18:46] Version 1.56 (February 2, 2004)
[03:18:46]
[03:18:46] Preparing to commence simulation
[03:18:46] - Assembly optimizations manually forced on.
[03:18:46] - Not checking prior termination.
[03:18:46] - Expanded 328411 -> 1861229 (decompressed 566.7 percent)
[03:18:46] - Starting from initial work packet
[03:18:46]
[03:18:46] Project: 859 (Run 381, Clone 2, Gen 0)
[03:18:46]
[03:18:46] Assembly optimizations on if available.
[03:18:46] Entering M.D.
[03:18:52] Protein: p859_p53dimer859
[03:18:52]
[03:18:52] Writing local files
[03:18:52] Extra SSE boost OK.
[03:18:53] Writing local files
[03:18:55] Completed 0 out of 2500000 steps (0)
[03:40:57] Writing local files
[03:40:59] Completed 25000 out of 2500000 steps (1)
[04:03:09] Writing local files
[04:03:11] Completed 50000 out of 2500000 steps (2)
[04:25:19] Writing local files
[04:25:21] Completed 75000 out of 2500000 steps (3)
[04:47:30] Writing local files
[04:47:32] Completed 100000 out of 2500000 steps (4)
[05:10:13] Writing local files
[05:10:15] Completed 125000 out of 2500000 steps (5)


And one on my 2400-M (Mandrake 9.2):

Note: Please read the license agreement (FAH4Console-Linux.exe -license). Further
use of this software requires that you have read and accepted this agreement.



--- Opening Log file [March 19 04:45:21]


# Linux Console Edition ################################################## #####
################################################## #############################

Folding@home Client Version 4.00

http://folding.stanford.edu

################################################## #############################
################################################## #############################

Arguments: -advmethods -forcesse -verbosity 9

Warning:
By using the -forceSSE flag, you are overriding program
safeguards that monitor the stability of SSE
instructions on your system. If you did not intend
to do this, please restart the program without
-forceSSE. If work units are not completing fully,
then please discontinue use of the flag.

[04:45:21] - Ask before connecting: No
[04:45:21] - User name: Papsomax (Team 32)
[04:45:21] - User ID = 52AAE65D374F8EDA
[04:45:21] - Machine ID: 3
[04:45:21]
[04:45:21] Loaded queue successfully.
[04:45:21] + Benchmarking ...
[04:45:25] The benchmark result is 8992
[04:45:25] - Autosending finished units...
[04:45:25] Trying to send all finished work units
[04:45:25] + No unsent completed units remaining.
[04:45:25] - Autosend completed
[04:45:25]
[04:45:25] + Processing work unit
[04:45:25] Core required: FahCore_78.exe
[04:45:25] Core found.
[04:45:25] Working on Unit 08 [March 19 04:45:25]
[04:45:25] + Working ...
[04:45:25] - Calling './FahCore_78.exe -dir work/ -suffix 08 -checkpoint 15 -forceSSE -verbose -lifeline 31027 -version 400'

[04:45:25]
[04:45:25] *------------------------------*
[04:45:25] Folding@home Gromacs Core
[04:45:25] Version 1.56 (February 2, 2004)
[04:45:25]
[04:45:25] Preparing to commence simulation
[04:45:25] - Ensuring status. Please wait.
[04:45:42] - Assembly optimizations manually forced on.
[04:45:42] - Not checking prior termination.
[04:45:43] - Expanded 328760 -> 1861229 (decompressed 566.1 percent)
[04:45:43] - Starting from initial work packet
[04:45:43]
[04:45:43] Project: 858 (Run 369, Clone 3, Gen 0)
[04:45:43]
[04:45:43] Assembly optimizations on if available.
[04:45:43] Entering M.D.

Gromacs is Copyright (c) 1991-2003, University of Groningen, The Netherlands
This inclusion of Gromacs code in the Folding@Home Core is under
a special license (see http://folding.stanford.edu/gromacs.html)
specially granted to Stanford by the copyright holders. If you
are interested in using Gromacs, visit www.gromacs.org where
you can download a free version of Gromacs under
the terms of the GNU General Public License (GPL) as published
by the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License,
or (at your option) any later version.

[04:45:49] Protein: p858_p53dimer858
[04:45:49]
[04:45:49] Writing local files
[04:45:49] Extra SSE boost OK.
[04:45:49] Writing local files
[04:45:51] Completed 0 out of 2500000 steps (0%)
[05:00:54] Timered checkpoint triggered.
[05:09:30] Writing local files
[05:09:32] Completed 25000 out of 2500000 steps (1%)
[05:24:34] Timered checkpoint triggered.
[05:32:51] Writing local files
[05:32:53] Completed 50000 out of 2500000 steps (2%)
[05:32:53] Completed 50000 out of 2500000 steps (2%)

This is the 3rd time for this protein on the 2400-M


Hooah!

[nikhsub1]

I have 10 of them on the 25 machines that I can monitor anyway... stats are going to blow chunks tomorrow.

[KrisMCool]

Glad to see I'm not alone with this WU.

2.8E: 17:11 single, 24:45 HT per frame
2.8C: 16:31 single, 28:39 HT per frame

[axlecrusher]

I have two of these on my dual. About 33 minutes per frame. 54 hours total WU time. My friend's P4 also has 2.

Axle

[OCn00b]

I've got 3 now, they break down like this:

2.48ghz XP - 20:40 per frame or 34 hours 26 minutes per unit
2.16ghz XP - 23:58 per frame or 39 hours 56 minutes per unit
2.2ghz Duron - 27:12 per frame or 45 hours 20 minutes per unit

The 2.48ghz XP is getting 780 ppw according to EM3, not too bad I'd say :)

[Fast420A]

On Wed. some beta protiens came out that said 160 points that were going at speeds of 32 pointers. I would have been at 10,000 PPW with just my 4 rigs that had these proteins. Turns out they were mispointed and were really 32 pointers. :( Well these are REAL 160 pointers but they work out to pretty much the same PPW as most other proteins.

[iD10t]

all my machine have managed to get these protiens.
30:06 and 29:30 min/frame on my 3.2 HT both instances.
21:20 min/frame on my friends 2.8 p4
and 19:30 min/frame on my 2.4 p4

i'm soo not getting points today:(

[Miralcos]

Originally posted by iD10t

i'm soo not getting points today:(

HEHE, at least that'll keep you behind me for one more day. :D

[45]

Out of the 20 rigs I just checked 12 of them have this protien

[Papsomax]

It's a frickin' conspiracy:eek: I say, another conspiracy theory at its best!!!!!!

Hooah!

[nikhsub1]

I am littered with them... must have 20 on 27 or so rigs I can check, even my laptop is working on one... 32 hours per WU, not bad eh?

[Lan_Of_Malkier]

Wow thats huge, I away out of the country right at this time, I wonder if my machines are crunching away at this......They have typicaly been chewing the 72(ish) pointers, so maybe they get these bigguns too!?

[Chris]

I have one too, biggest protein points wise I have had I think.

-Chris

[L337 M33P]

I have a p859_p53dimer859 and damn, it's a big 'un - 23 minutes per % :eek:

Looks like I need to pull an all-nighter at 2.4GHz :s

[stompbox]

p859_p53dimer859 too bad it hit my slowest comp @ 40:24 per frame

[Papsomax]

Looking at the oc stats at 30 ponts for the day, looks like all my systems must have these proteins. I can't check my 5 work pc as they are spread around different stores.

Hooah!

[JerMe]

holy mugger... p858_p53dimer858... about 800ppw! This machine usually doesn't go over 650ppw. I likey. :)

[Mustanley]

19:36 per frame on a 2.5GHz Barton. 822 PPW

[BIB]

just got one on my p4 1500mhz 43 minutes a frame
2 days 22 hours to complete.

[new_novice]

25 mins and 30 secs for Opteron 242.

http://www.vommexanh.org/1

[walaka7]

wow i was wondering why my ppd blew today.. i have 5 out of 6 clients working on these. LIke said earlier, today suxor tomorrow roxor :D my ghetto dual 1600/1900 are 30 minute per frame and my 2400 dual is around 28 min/frame.

[Roboman101]

i got one as well on my p4

[slater3333uk]

Got 4

25min a frame on my 2400@2350, 600ishppw, normal:)

[nikhsub1]

Yeah my PPD today is less than half of normal...

[dagamore]

i know your pain, right nowe i have 9 out of 12 cpu's working on them (hell my damn laptop (not in that count) has a 120 pointer right now :()) but i look to have a great day a few days from now, and my average ppd and ppw have gone up a little bit with these new WU's (they just take too long to actualy do)

http://www.iupload.net/022004/emIII160points9of13.JPG

[Tismedt]

I now have 5 going. It would have been 6 but My daughter locked up her rig with some cheapa** proggie she downloaded:mad: and lost the wu after reboot.

[Papsomax]

AARGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGG! All my folding units except one have these proteins!

[Tismedt]

WOW Stanford must want some results on this protien quick. I've never seen folding get flooded with one protien like this.

BTW nice farm Dagamore. Lots O'Powah

[Maxvla]

every rig i have has one now.

points will be pretty good tomorrow though.

[Audioaficionado]

Once they start dropping into the stats, it should be business as usual. What we need is a 160 pointer that folds like a 32 pointer :D

[JetMech]

Look real close at the actual protein name. I have two clients going on my HT machine and they both indicate 160 pointer / 31.5 points per frame. However after studying it a while I noticed that one of them is actually a 520_bba5_ pf/33points.

[Andy71600]

i just got one of these on my 2400+ machine... its takin forever!

[nightowl]

They are running at around 40 minutes per frame on my xp1700s

http://www.cowboy.eclipse.co.uk/emIII.gif

[drshivas]

An observation...

Originally posted by OCn00b
I've got 3 now, they break down like this:

2.48ghz XP - 20:40 per frame or 34 hours 26 minutes per unit
2.16ghz XP - 23:58 per frame or 39 hours 56 minutes per unit
2.2ghz Duron - 27:12 per frame or 45 hours 20 minutes per unit

The 2.48ghz XP is getting 780 ppw according to EM3, not too bad I'd say :)

See how the 2.2 duron is taking longer than the 2.16 XP? I know that larger cache doesn't affect FAH, but how do you explain this? Could it be these new protiens are taking advantage of larger caches? Or has this Duron/XP gap always existed at equal speeds?

[Tismedt]

Well I don't know about the duron/xp gap but I know I now have 9 out of 10 on my farm. I still wonder about the flood factor. Why so many at once?

[matrixzen]

My P4 does 22 min/per frame. Haven't checked my Athlon XP 1700 but I bet it's pretty bad. Won't even mention my P///.