- Joined
- Mar 9, 2004
- Location
- california
witch os is better for rendering dvd quality mpeg video....thanks
-
Welcome to Overclockers Forums! Join us to reply in threads, receive reduced ads, and to customize your site experience!
windows 2000pro or xp pro?
- Thread starter theguywiththeha
- Start date
- Joined
- Nov 24, 2003
- Location
- Atlanta, GA
well i dunno this for sure, but i would think xp pro b/c its more up to date and such. but i thought that would depend on your vid card or the software you are using? like i said i dunno for sure.
OP
- Joined
- Mar 9, 2004
- Location
- california
- Thread Starter
- #3
my video card is a grforce 3 ti500 and pinical studio 8 software
- Joined
- Aug 15, 2001
- Location
- Toronto,Canada(I can see you....)
It shouldn't really matter, they are almost the same in the situation you described. 2000 is less bloated, XP has a few nice features. For a work environment I would pick 2000Pro.
OP
- Joined
- Mar 9, 2004
- Location
- california
- Thread Starter
- #5
thanks i like 2000pro more anyways....lol
Last edited:
- Joined
- Nov 6, 2002
Since I dont know what system you are running...
W2K for AMD's
XP for Intels
AMD's do process better on W2K...
W2K for AMD's
XP for Intels
AMD's do process better on W2K...
- Joined
- Aug 15, 2001
- Location
- Toronto,Canada(I can see you....)
glock19owner said:
Is that really true? I'm not doubting you but I find that really interesting, because why would it say optimised for Windows XP on the AXP's packaging?
OP
- Joined
- Mar 9, 2004
- Location
- california
- Thread Starter
- #8
well i put my setup in my sig so it can help
- Joined
- Nov 6, 2002
Tebore said:
Similar threads
