-
Welcome to Overclockers Forums! Join us to reply in threads, receive reduced ads, and to customize your site experience!
Kinda Newbish question
- Thread starter silentx51
- Start date
- Joined
- Sep 16, 2003
- Location
- Knoxville, TN
WELCOME TO THE FORUMS!!!
...and the sickness
You gotta be more descriptive. What CPU is this for?
It all depends on ur memory bandwith too. Usually lower latency (the numbers) are better. However Intel benefits much more from the higher FSB and clock.
OCing is a messy science. It can oly be tailored to the individual
...and the sickness
You gotta be more descriptive. What CPU is this for?
= Best setting for an Intel chip
= Better for an AMD chip
It all depends on ur memory bandwith too. Usually lower latency (the numbers) are better. However Intel benefits much more from the higher FSB and clock.
OCing is a messy science. It can oly be tailored to the individual
- Thread Starter
- #3
Hi thx 4 the reply..
its actually a P4C 2.8 right now its at 240FSB 2.5/7/3/3 i have the OCZ GOLD pc3700 rev.2 ram. default vcore/2.80ram
if i go to 250fsb i need to up the vcore and set higher latency numbers.
so i dunno if its worth it
its actually a P4C 2.8 right now its at 240FSB 2.5/7/3/3 i have the OCZ GOLD pc3700 rev.2 ram. default vcore/2.80ram
if i go to 250fsb i need to up the vcore and set higher latency numbers.
so i dunno if its worth it
- Joined
- Apr 27, 2002
- Location
- wash dc area
most likely the the 250 3-4-4-8 because proc speed out weighs memory bw by a factor of 3-5
- Joined
- Feb 12, 2003
Try both ways out and see what is best by running benchmarks.
- Joined
- Apr 27, 2002
- Location
- wash dc area
SeanOMatic said:Try both ways out and see what is best by running benchmarks.
good idea.
- Joined
- Jan 29, 2002
- Location
- hamburg - germany
240 2.5-3-3
Similar threads
