K kikkler Registered Joined Aug 23, 2003 Apr 6, 2004 #1 I have to decide between the new mushkin cas 222 3200 and the mushkin pc4000 (3-4-4-8). i have 2.6, IC7 (2.8v max VDIMM), sp94
I have to decide between the new mushkin cas 222 3200 and the mushkin pc4000 (3-4-4-8). i have 2.6, IC7 (2.8v max VDIMM), sp94
NinjaWreck Member Joined Jan 8, 2004 Location C'ville, VA Apr 6, 2004 #2 Depends on your overclock. If you want your fsb to go more than 230 (2990) you will need to get the PC4000.
Depends on your overclock. If you want your fsb to go more than 230 (2990) you will need to get the PC4000.
D devvingiorgio Member Joined Aug 25, 2003 Location Pennsylvania Apr 6, 2004 #4 I concur, if you can do the 2-2-2 dance, do the 5:4..it'll be easier on the CPU
OP K kikkler Registered Joined Aug 23, 2003 Apr 6, 2004 Thread Starter #5 i heard that the bh-6 needs lots of voltage to perform nicely is 2225 : 225fsb possible with 2.8v ?
craig588 Member Joined Dec 24, 2003 Apr 6, 2004 #6 dont use 2-2-2-5, its performance is identical if not worse than 2-2-2-6 and it also is more unstable. It might do it, I really reccomend you vmod your board, BH5/6 ram is terrific using 3.3V.
dont use 2-2-2-5, its performance is identical if not worse than 2-2-2-6 and it also is more unstable. It might do it, I really reccomend you vmod your board, BH5/6 ram is terrific using 3.3V.
OP K kikkler Registered Joined Aug 23, 2003 Apr 6, 2004 Thread Starter #7 that's for certain, but i'm not sure i have the guts for it
F flapperhead Senior Member Joined Apr 27, 2002 Location wash dc area Apr 7, 2004 #8 the bh6 will work fine up to 200-210 at 2.8v. but heck thats all u need at 5/4
D Diablo's Mage Registered Joined Dec 9, 2003 Apr 8, 2004 #9 my experances so far (mushkin PC3500 2-3-3-6): 2.8 @ 200 fsb 1:1 [ddr400] (underclocked ram) = good 2.8 @ 217 fsb 1:1 [ddr433] (stock ram speeds) = better 2.8 @ 250 fsb 5:4 [ddr 400] (underclocked ram) = best I was puzzled to find out running @ 3.5 ghz/ddr400, my memory bandwidth performed better than running ddr433 [217 1:1] (i dont have the numbers handy to display @ this time.) I chose PC3500 because I wasn't sure my CPU would hit the magic 250, so at least i'd be around 220 @ 1:1. but now I wish I went with PC3700 or PC4000 And, I didn't feel I needed to spend an extra hundred $$$ for 5% extra ram performance
my experances so far (mushkin PC3500 2-3-3-6): 2.8 @ 200 fsb 1:1 [ddr400] (underclocked ram) = good 2.8 @ 217 fsb 1:1 [ddr433] (stock ram speeds) = better 2.8 @ 250 fsb 5:4 [ddr 400] (underclocked ram) = best I was puzzled to find out running @ 3.5 ghz/ddr400, my memory bandwidth performed better than running ddr433 [217 1:1] (i dont have the numbers handy to display @ this time.) I chose PC3500 because I wasn't sure my CPU would hit the magic 250, so at least i'd be around 220 @ 1:1. but now I wish I went with PC3700 or PC4000 And, I didn't feel I needed to spend an extra hundred $$$ for 5% extra ram performance