- Joined
- Aug 15, 2003
- Location
- Ft. Hood, TX
Those who havn't checked this out already, OCWorkBench has posted three benchmarks comparing a Socket 939 FX (2.2GHz) with single-channel and with dual-channel. It's said to be done with the same CPU, and isn't a comparison between a Socket 754 3400+ (2.2GHz) with a Socket 939 FX (2.2GHz). It is done on a Socket 939 motherboard with the SiS756-chipset, presumably a referance board design.
It doesn't show too much, but does give an idea of what to expect when comparing performance of Socket 754 single-channel Athlon64's (w/ 1MB L2 Cache) against Socket 939 dual-channel FX (w/ 1MB L2 Cache).
SANDRA 2003, QUAKE 3, and C.C Winston 2003 are the benchmarks.
SANDRA 2003 Buffered (INT/FLOAT)
Single Channel - 3101/3099
Dual Channel - 5763.5/5706.5
QUAKE 3 (800x600 / 1024x768)
Single Channel - 369.6 / 354.8
Dual Channel - 393.8 / 374.1
C.C Winston 2003
Single Channel - 40.6
Dual Channel - 43.8
Newspost @ OCWorkBench - http://www.ocworkbench.com/ocwbcgi/newspro/viewnews.cgi?newsid1081779022,50567,
Discussion @ OCWorkBench - http://www.ocworkbench.com/ocwbcgi/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic;f=29;t=000711
It doesn't show too much, but does give an idea of what to expect when comparing performance of Socket 754 single-channel Athlon64's (w/ 1MB L2 Cache) against Socket 939 dual-channel FX (w/ 1MB L2 Cache).
SANDRA 2003, QUAKE 3, and C.C Winston 2003 are the benchmarks.
SANDRA 2003 Buffered (INT/FLOAT)
Single Channel - 3101/3099
Dual Channel - 5763.5/5706.5
QUAKE 3 (800x600 / 1024x768)
Single Channel - 369.6 / 354.8
Dual Channel - 393.8 / 374.1
C.C Winston 2003
Single Channel - 40.6
Dual Channel - 43.8
Newspost @ OCWorkBench - http://www.ocworkbench.com/ocwbcgi/newspro/viewnews.cgi?newsid1081779022,50567,
Discussion @ OCWorkBench - http://www.ocworkbench.com/ocwbcgi/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic;f=29;t=000711
Last edited:
