OK "U" Pros. FSB,CPU,Mem,Sandra ??

[Rottys-R-Us]

Ok sitting here eat AM chow,yum. Messing with settings. :eek:

fsb @ 150x10- sandra, mem-626/819, cpu-4219/2065.

fsb @ 144x10.5- sandra, mem-614/789, cpu-4322/2099.

fsb @ 140x11- sandra, mem-588/752, cpu-4310/2100.

Mem up cpu down, hmm.

Mem settings @ 8-8-7-2-2-2-2.

I know SETI like's higher FSb.

So what do "U" think? :rolleyes:

Dave.

Crunch-eth on.

[chawken]

Originally posted by Rotts-R-Uz

fsb @ 150x10- sandra, mem-626/819, cpu-4219/2065.
fsb @ 144x10.5- sandra, mem-614/789, cpu-4322/2099.
fsb @ 140x11- sandra, mem-588/752, cpu-4310/2100.
I know SETI like's higher FSb.

So what do "U" think? :rolleyes:



I would go with the higher fsb - you're moving more data at 150.

[Rottys-R-Us]

Thanks. thats the answer I was hoping for, that's what I have been runnig it @.

Dave.

[piffdog]

Yup, I would have to agree, go for the 150mhz fsb. its just plain faster, that is of course not true if you are living in a paralell mac universe!;)

[kat]

fsb is the way to go

play some game do some surfing and run prime 95 to see if your system is giving good info to seti :D