-
Welcome to Overclockers Forums! Join us to reply in threads, receive reduced ads, and to customize your site experience!
3.1Ghz Barton
- Thread starter bass
- Start date
- Joined
- Feb 25, 2004
- Location
- MA, USA
um, wow. Never seen that before, Can we have the rest of the specs of your system?
9mmCensor
Disabled
- Joined
- Oct 23, 2003
- Location
- Banned Camp
NICE. Is that stable... prime95, 3DMark, ect.
None the less very nice... mmm M2 GT....
None the less very nice... mmm M2 GT....
- Joined
- Apr 17, 2004
if AMD had continued bartons, this would be 5200+
- Joined
- Nov 30, 2003
- Location
- Illinois
i don't know it kinda looks photoshoped, it has a different font than other screenshots that i have seem.
Last edited:
- Joined
- Oct 9, 2003
- Location
- Phoenix. YOUR HAIR IS GOOD TO EAT
The only thing that strikes me as very odd is that the FSB is at 206, but the CPU still reports at 3100.6 MHz. Yes it's a mobile, just look at the picture. I'm still skeptical though. =\
- Joined
- Nov 6, 2003
- Location
- Denver, CO
Wow! 2.1Vcore, I do not doubt it. Be carefull though, there have been people that ran around 2 volts and messed up their L2 cache even at subzero temps. And that, I heard about was a Tbred B, a 1.65stock vcore chip. This is a mobile, so be carefull, it probably is not designed for as high a vcore as other higher stock vcore AMD CPU's.
As for the font, I dont think it is a different font, just the screenie is low quality from when it was saved. What is that wierd text in the intructions box?
BTW, nice O/C!
As for the font, I dont think it is a different font, just the screenie is low quality from when it was saved. What is that wierd text in the intructions box?
BTW, nice O/C!
- Joined
- Dec 17, 2000
@md0Cer said:
Mobles are the same core as desktops...
Exact same.
Just more hand picking is done as they can run at lower voltage...
So treat them the exact same as you would a desktop
Oh and whats with the FSB???
Why so low?
You figure someone that has the cash for that cooling could get some decent ram
9mmCensor
Disabled
- Joined
- Oct 23, 2003
- Location
- Banned Camp
What is the extra writing in the "Instructions" area?
- Joined
- Feb 8, 2004
- Location
- Jericho Vermont
if your skeptical about this look at the 3.2 ghz on air...
CandymanCan
Disabled
- Joined
- Aug 14, 2003
- Location
- Woodbridge, Va
The text looks bold because he had to resize th eimag and he clicked Sharpen, it does that with my images also.
At least i mguessing thats what he did
At least i mguessing thats what he did
- Joined
- Apr 28, 2004
- Location
- St. Louis, MO
The JPG I see is definitely photochopped. Look in the supported instructions field. What the hell is that gobble-dee-gook in there?
Looks doctored to me without a doubt.
Looks doctored to me without a doubt.
- Joined
- Apr 28, 2004
- Location
- Sunnyvale, CA
I think it's just an artifact under "instruction" field, at least it's a possibility. I don't think anyone who even bother photoshopping would leave something that obvious left on their pic. I'm sure it's barely running at that speed tho, should run around 2.9ghz with stability.
Also notice "unknown CPU 'typ,'" wrong output from unstability?
Also notice "unknown CPU 'typ,'" wrong output from unstability?
- Joined
- Apr 17, 2004
whats up with these people posting 3+ghz and responding to anyones questions about steppings, photoshop etc....?
- Joined
- Jul 30, 2001
- Location
- Mauritius
Agreed! To merely post a screenshot without any follow up at all, arouses suspicion of its authenticy due to the frustration of those waiting for more information. That said I would think that 3.1GHz on a Mach2 is definitely doable.Gogeta_G3D said:
Similar threads
