- Joined
- Aug 21, 2002
- Location
- Fort Wayne, IN
i thought prime is tests ram hardcore because it's in a windows environment. im stable @ 210fsb in prime for 10hrs , but in goldmem i am not 210fsb stable.
-
Welcome to Overclockers Forums! Join us to reply in threads, receive reduced ads, and to customize your site experience!
prime stable @ 210fsb , but not goldmem stable?
- Thread starter drewthomas14
- Start date
- Joined
- Feb 12, 2003
I wouldn't put much trust into Goldmem, try Memtest+ instead.
OP
- Joined
- Aug 21, 2002
- Location
- Fort Wayne, IN
- Thread Starter
- #3
lol. i was thinking the same thing. it used to be good when i tried it last summer, now it sucks. it took 1hr for the "quick test"
from my first post. if im prime stable, shouldnt i be memtest / goldmem stable ?
from my first post. if im prime stable, shouldnt i be memtest / goldmem stable ?
OP
- Joined
- Aug 21, 2002
- Location
- Fort Wayne, IN
- Thread Starter
- #4
OP
- Joined
- Aug 21, 2002
- Location
- Fort Wayne, IN
- Thread Starter
- #5
^^
- Joined
- Oct 9, 2003
- Location
- Illinois
I would run memtest or loop the memory benchmark from sandra to double check
OP
- Joined
- Aug 21, 2002
- Location
- Fort Wayne, IN
- Thread Starter
- #7
i ran memtest and im stable . but im still wondering , if ur prime stable , does that mean u should be memtest stable too?
- Joined
- May 25, 2003
- Location
- galesburg illinois
drewthomas14 said:
no because prime will use alot more of the cpu than it does memory
ive passed a 24 hour prime stress test but failed memtest on its second pass before
