Terminat.
09-04-04, 02:41 PM
Is there any difference between ATA100 and UATA?
UATA is theoretically 33mb/s faster than ATA100, and yet people often say it doesn't matter because the 7200rpm drive is the bottleneck. If that's so, why are SATA150 7200rpm drives faster? I am saying, because I have two pcs, one with a 2mb cache ATA100, and another with a 2mb cache UATA. The latter seems faster.
Secondly, how much of a difference does the cache make, from 2mb to 8mb, and is it a real-life difference, as opposed to a theoretical one?
UATA is theoretically 33mb/s faster than ATA100, and yet people often say it doesn't matter because the 7200rpm drive is the bottleneck. If that's so, why are SATA150 7200rpm drives faster? I am saying, because I have two pcs, one with a 2mb cache ATA100, and another with a 2mb cache UATA. The latter seems faster.
Secondly, how much of a difference does the cache make, from 2mb to 8mb, and is it a real-life difference, as opposed to a theoretical one?