ciku Member Joined Jan 15, 2004 Sep 24, 2004 #1 which one is faster? 2.5-6-3-3? or 2-7-4-4? i was ready a lot of things and now im confuse
HousERaT Senior Air Extraordinaire Joined Apr 9, 2004 Location Imladris Sep 24, 2004 #2 the lower the numbers the better, in most cases.....
Jess1313 Member Joined Feb 15, 2004 Sep 24, 2004 #3 ciku said: which one is faster? 2.5-6-3-3? or 2-7-4-4? i was ready a lot of things and now im confuse Click to expand... i would say 2.5-6-3-3( this being CAS-tRAS-tRCD-tRP i would assume ) because in most cases tRCD and tRP have more influence than CAS. look at OCZ's EB series for example there is 3-8-2-2-(CAS-tRAS-tRCD-tRP) and is almost as fast as 2-8-2-2.
ciku said: which one is faster? 2.5-6-3-3? or 2-7-4-4? i was ready a lot of things and now im confuse Click to expand... i would say 2.5-6-3-3( this being CAS-tRAS-tRCD-tRP i would assume ) because in most cases tRCD and tRP have more influence than CAS. look at OCZ's EB series for example there is 3-8-2-2-(CAS-tRAS-tRCD-tRP) and is almost as fast as 2-8-2-2.
OP ciku Member Joined Jan 15, 2004 Sep 24, 2004 Thread Starter #4 ok cool thanx for ur replies... im using 2.5-6-3-3