Cas Latency's...

ciku

Member

​

Joined

Jan 15, 2004

• Sep 24, 2004

• #1

which one is faster? 2.5-6-3-3? or 2-7-4-4? i was ready a lot of things and now im confuse

 

HousERaT

Senior Air Extraordinaire

​

Joined

Apr 9, 2004

Location

Imladris

• Sep 24, 2004

• #2

the lower the numbers the better, in most cases.....

 

Jess1313

Member

​

Joined

Feb 15, 2004

• Sep 24, 2004

• #3

ciku said:

which one is faster? 2.5-6-3-3? or 2-7-4-4? i was ready a lot of things and now im confuse

Click to expand...

i would say 2.5-6-3-3( this being CAS-tRAS-tRCD-tRP i would assume ) because in most cases tRCD and tRP have more influence than CAS.

look at OCZ's EB series for example there is 3-8-2-2-(CAS-tRAS-tRCD-tRP) and is almost as fast as 2-8-2-2.

 

OP

ciku

Member

​

Joined

Jan 15, 2004

• Sep 24, 2004

• Thread Starter
• #4

ok cool thanx for ur replies... im using 2.5-6-3-3