CrystalMethod, i know, but as i said, the GA-8KNXP adds a little more..
the 2 basic pata, 4 drives, 2 Sata by ICH5, 2 by SiL, and finaly 2xpata by Gigaraid chip.
Lets count on fingers shal ve, i get easyly confused, so i'll try my best.. 2+2 Pata channels (where of only 2 are raidable) thats 4 Pata channels, each good for 2 drives each, 8 drives, and then there was 2+2 Sata.. Um, they only support 1 drive each so this math wont hurt my head as much... somhow it seams to be a total of 12 drives?
Scary, seams the GA-8KNXP still is recomended IF he wants the extra drives... Like i did want the extra drive options. If he dosent, then i belive the Asus card is the better overclocker, but not by that much.. also, IF he dosent want the raid possabilities that much... ALL ICH5 Sata mobos, support raid... so if it dosent have to be Pata, he can get a much cheaper card.
btw Crystal, that means both mobos support a total of 3 raid sets, just that the Gigabyte supports a larger Pata raid.. and if thats your fancy, turn of the raid mode, and the gigaraid chip supports 4 atapi units... (yes, you can run 1 atapi, and 3 harddrives, but no raid at all possible when connecting a atapi device to the gigaraid chip, my advice, use the 2 standard pata channels for atapi devices if needed...)
CrystalMethod, both mobos are a good choise, offcourse, they are just slightly different (come to think of it, dosent the Asus card use the 3Com Gigabit lan chip, means its max speed is 266Mbit, limited by the PCI bus, where as Gigabyte picked the Intel "original" chip, not having a shared PCI channel...altho, both should keep most home users happy) Im happy trotting along with my board, i think he well be happy aswell, aslong as he looks at what he needs, and dosent cut a corner and later find out he would have wanted something different. Most reports say the asus card is a better overclocker. that is its strongest card.
B!