WilliamG
11-11-04, 11:39 PM
I am about to upgrade my computer and will try to build my first system. I have spent some time doing research but still have LOTS to learn. Some background: I am not a "hardcore" gamer, but I want to update my system because I wish to play some recent games (e.g. Myst 4), which require at least a DirectX 8 card. I don't play Ultima, Doom or any of the many games frequently mentioned here, but that is because my current system cannot play those games. Maybe now I will be able to give them a try :clap:
I want to build a system that will last about 4-5 years without 'major' upgrades. Since I am not a hardcore gamer this should not be a problem, but to accomplish that I probably need very good performance right now, so that in 4-5 years it will still be "acceptable". Since this is my very first attempt at building my system I will not try to overclock it from the start. I will probably build it, use it for a few months, and then try my first steps at overclocking it once I have a chance to learn a lot more about it.
I am now leaning towards an Athlon 64 3200+ Socket 939, 1GB RAM. Stock HSF for starters, may upgrade once I start trying to overclock. Will probably use a SATA HDD. I will probably buy my system sometime in Q1 2005.
I need some guidance in selecting a Video Card. Based on reviews I have read here and at Anandtech I am leaning towards an nVidia GeForce 6600GT (PCIe) but I had some questions.
- How should I go about selecting a particular manufacturer? Are there any with great reputations, or ones I should stay away from? Since I'd like this card to last a few years, a reliable manufacturer is important. Also, I would like one that would allow me to (eventually) overclock the card if I ever decide to try that (not sure it's possible with all cards?).
- The second question is more general. I have read a few times that currently PCIe has no performance advantage over AGP. Why is this? I am leaning towards PCIe to improve "future compatibility" since I want the system to last 4-5 years. Is this a good idea?
- Finally, assuming that the GeForce 6600 GT and the ATI Radeon X700 (pro or XT) are more or less comparable in performance and price, is there any major objective reason to choose one over the other? Or is it strictly a matter of taste and performance?
Thanks in advance for any help! I look forward to becoming part of this community, and maybe some day learn enough to even ( :gasp: ) start ANSWERING questions!
I want to build a system that will last about 4-5 years without 'major' upgrades. Since I am not a hardcore gamer this should not be a problem, but to accomplish that I probably need very good performance right now, so that in 4-5 years it will still be "acceptable". Since this is my very first attempt at building my system I will not try to overclock it from the start. I will probably build it, use it for a few months, and then try my first steps at overclocking it once I have a chance to learn a lot more about it.
I am now leaning towards an Athlon 64 3200+ Socket 939, 1GB RAM. Stock HSF for starters, may upgrade once I start trying to overclock. Will probably use a SATA HDD. I will probably buy my system sometime in Q1 2005.
I need some guidance in selecting a Video Card. Based on reviews I have read here and at Anandtech I am leaning towards an nVidia GeForce 6600GT (PCIe) but I had some questions.
- How should I go about selecting a particular manufacturer? Are there any with great reputations, or ones I should stay away from? Since I'd like this card to last a few years, a reliable manufacturer is important. Also, I would like one that would allow me to (eventually) overclock the card if I ever decide to try that (not sure it's possible with all cards?).
- The second question is more general. I have read a few times that currently PCIe has no performance advantage over AGP. Why is this? I am leaning towards PCIe to improve "future compatibility" since I want the system to last 4-5 years. Is this a good idea?
- Finally, assuming that the GeForce 6600 GT and the ATI Radeon X700 (pro or XT) are more or less comparable in performance and price, is there any major objective reason to choose one over the other? Or is it strictly a matter of taste and performance?
Thanks in advance for any help! I look forward to becoming part of this community, and maybe some day learn enough to even ( :gasp: ) start ANSWERING questions!