Would this card perform better than my Asus Geforce 256 DDR deluxe?

[Cisco Kid]

WinFast GeForce2 MX SH Pro (GeForce2 MX-400 with 5.5ns memory)

I can upgrade to this card for about $50 after selling mine or should I just save and get a radeon 64 ddr vivo.

Second what is the benefit of 64 ddr ram over 32 ddr ram is it actually used at all. Third is the 32 DDR radeon a good pick as well. I just want better 2d video than my Asus card and also to improve my 3d and 3dmark2001 score


AMD 1.2 pc266 @ 1.2 w Global Win fop heatsink & cak 38 fan
MSI K7T266 Pro Raid DDR
2x256 Crucial pc2100 DDR
Maxtor ata100 7200 rpm 60 gig drive
Asus V6800 Geforce 256 DDR Deluxe
Realteck Nic card
Yamaha 8x8x24 burner
Soundblaster pci 128
Pine 44x CD rom

:cool: :cool:

[jeff_harrison_344]

If I were you, I would definately go for the Raddeon ViVo. Way better features, GREAT 32bit performance, ect. An all around great card.

[!-=sky=-!]

get the radeon............u cant compare the two cards......bascially the radeon is better than the geforce 2mx of course

[Burning Phoenix]

I use to have that asus card also and loved it at the time. It was able to give very high scores in 3dmark2000. It overclocked high and stayed cool. I wouldn't buy any MX cards and don't buy the ASUS 7700 Deluxe either which i have now. It does get good scores but runs very hot ; at least for me and i've even put on a bigger heatsink and fan. Wish i went for the geforce ultra or geforce 3.

[proze]

have replied in that radeon ve thread, but here you go:

the mx400 would hardly be an upgrade, if at all. i've both an mx400 and a gf pro, and if anything the gf pro is a bit quicker that the mx400, in both my tbird/ddr system and my duron/sdram system.

i'd say definitely wait for the radeon.