Got a few mchines I would like to test for uptime with a load on them.I usually test with prime 95,but would like to try something different.Which would be better to run?
Either would work just as well. I'm a SETI addict myself and would of course suggest it, but it's not really a big deal either way. Both will keep your CPU toasty, it's just a matter of choice as to which of our teams you want to help
With you having "a few machines", you could even run both and not have to make the choice
JigPu
I would say SETI@home. I do not like that the Folding@Home website is inconsistent with regard to the name of "Folding@Home" (note representation of the text "Folding@home" on an image on main Folding@Home page).
I run folding. I like the idea that this might somehow benefit me or someone I know someday. It just might save your life.... ;o)
I think JigPu's idea has merrit though. Why choose, unless you wan't to compete for points. I'm slowly getting there, on page 5 of the rankings now....
Another reason why I would not prefer folding is that party that mosts benefits from Folding@Home use is Stanford Uninversity (its reputation and percieved worth would increase). Perhaps Stanford University giving some kind of compensation may change my position.
Another reason why I would not prefer folding is that party that mosts benefits from Folding@Home use is Stanford Uninversity (its reputation and percieved worth would increase). Perhaps Stanford University giving some kind of compensation may change my position.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.