2400 in 3dMark2001.....How about you?

[TUK101]

I just installed a Radeon 32mb ddr card today, and so far have consistantly gotten 2390+ on up to 2400+ scores. I am estatic since the card that I replaced was a Geforce MX200. Quite an improvement over 1400 scores. Anyhow, what are some of you guys scores with the same card, or the Radeon Le cards? By the way, I do have the card clocked up to 189 with Radeon Tweak. Could I possible get better results with the Powerstrip program that I keep hearing about?:cool:

[Topo]

I know you were looking for comparison's to like cards...But, I just got done benching with the new Detonator4's and thought it would be worthwile for comparison also...This post isn't intended as a flame..

[Zuck Gou :)]

Originally posted by TUK101
I just installed a Radeon 32mb ddr card today, and so far have consistantly gotten 2390+ on up to 2400+ scores. I am estatic since the card that I replaced was a Geforce MX200. Quite an improvement over 1400 scores. Anyhow, what are some of you guys scores with the same card, or the Radeon Le cards? By the way, I do have the card clocked up to 189 with Radeon Tweak. Could I possible get better results with the Powerstrip program that I keep hearing about?:cool:

189 on a Regular 32DDR? Or on an Le?

189 is about right for the LE, if its a 32DDR you can maybe get up around 210 probably.

[Monaco]

Well I have a different setup completely- but I had to post as I get exactly 2400 as my score also.

I have a Gefore2 GTS
Celeron 566 @ 961
256MB of CL2
Soyo SY-6vba133, an Apollo Pro 133 board

Don't know if it's good but that's what I got.

[!-=sky=-!]

rig in my sig

and 4268 points in 3dmark2001

that's good enough for me

[TUK101]

Originally posted by Topo
I know you were looking for comparison's to like cards...But, I just got done benching with the new Detonator4's and thought it would be worthwile for comparison also...This post isn't intended as a flame.. Darned nice score dude!!! I wish that I could have afforded to buy the GeForce 3 myself, but with kids and slow work and such......well, the funds arent there for that card as of yet. Maybe after X-mas. Sweet scores and by all means its not a flame to post those. :eek: :cool:

[TUK101]

Originally posted by !-=sky=-!
sys in my sig

and 4268 points in 3dmark2001

that's good enough for me What is "sys"? Havent heard that one yet?

[Sohryu Asuka Langley]

This was done quite a while ago under ME which just totally sucked. I gotta update it.

2489
http://gamershq.madonion.com/compare2k1.shtml?1355954

"sys" is system, computer, box, setup. Something to call your computer details or the like.

[Superman53142]

3124 with a RAdeon LE and Athlon 1.0 200FSB. Too lazy to get link right now. BTW, that's at 195/195 with 7075 drivers. If you get the beta drivers they don't support vertex or pixel shading very well at all.

[ymNA]

My LE got 3080 @ 193 with Windows 2000

"3124 with a RAdeon LE and Athlon 1.0 200FSB. Too lazy to get link right now. BTW, that's at 195/195 with 7075 drivers. If you get the beta drivers they don't support vertex or pixel shading very well at all."

I thought Radeon DDR doesn't support Pixel shading at all.

[funnyperson1]

Originally posted by Monster of Rock
Well I have a different setup completely- but I had to post as I get exactly 2400 as my score also.

I have a Gefore2 GTS
Celeron 566 @ 961
256MB of CL2
Soyo SY-6vba133, an Apollo Pro 133 board

Don't know if it's good but that's what I got.
your cpu's holding you back....

[Tycho]

3dMark2k1 compare url
http://gamershq.madonion.com/compare2k1.shtml?1572110

score: 3335
Thats with Win2k sp2, amd 1.4, radeon le @ 189/189
and an sis 735 mobo

[Monaco]

your cpu's holding you back....

yeah no kidding! but hey, 2400 seems pretty good, and q3 runs at 100fps+ sustained with all the options maxed out. That's all I'm looking for!!

Besides, spend $250 to upgrade to Athlon just for some 3dMark points? I don't think sooo...... I'm way too cheap.:):)

[-=UR=- Ranger]

The Kyro II really sucks in 3D Mark 2001

I get only 1915 with my setup

[funnyperson1]

Originally posted by Monster of Rock


yeah no kidding! but hey, 2400 seems pretty good, and q3 runs at 100fps+ sustained with all the options maxed out. That's all I'm looking for!!

Besides, spend $250 to upgrade to Athlon just for some 3dMark points? I don't think sooo...... I'm way too cheap.:):)
i feel you man....iget 3000 points and i have a geforce2pro.....with an athlon i could get 4500 maybe, but my games run nice...thats all i ask for.....:)...except of course for max payne which i have to turn down to medium quality to play.....

[diehrd]

That G3 scores nicely,,See my sig.I may not do the frame rate of a G3 but I gurantee image quality is as good or better and I am able to burn Movies to CdRw with no add on card or additional software,,Cost 149.00 I must LOL

[TUK101]

Originally posted by Superman53142
3124 with a RAdeon LE and Athlon 1.0 200FSB. Too lazy to get link right now. BTW, that's at 195/195 with 7075 drivers. If you get the beta drivers they don't support vertex or pixel shading very well at all. Thanks, I was wondering about that. That is the driver that I am running too. I am in the works of getting the supported driver. 10 mb on a modem is quite a dl, so I am waiting till I have the time.

[!!tio!!]

Didn't overclock my GFX card
is still 200/366 (I think thats the default) But I overclock to 1200mhz

the score is 2999

damn almost 3000

[!-=sky=-!]

Originally posted by TUK101
What is "sys"? Havent heard that one yet?

my bad.........rig...

[Violator]

3700 under Win 98 http://gamershq.madonion.com/compare2k1.shtml?1586078

Now testing under Win 2000, 3748 so far, I'll post comparison when I'm done :)

[Oni]

W/ the box in the sig, I hit 3706

[It_The_Cow]

4081 after a fresh install of 98SE. Now I wouldn't be surprised if I got 2500. I think it's a driver comflict. Anyways, it was at 166/166, 7153 Beta Drivers, 3DMark 2001 Default Settings, and everything below

[Violator]

It_The_Cow

Are you saying you got over 4000 points at 1024x768x32 with 166/166 clock speeds and a P3 clocked at less than 1Ghz, AND the 7153 betas? I find that really hard to believe. If I drop my clock down to 166/166 I get just over 3100, and the 7153s are not the fastest for benchmarking

[hduong]

Hey TUK101, How are yah liking the card? Well I have a radeon le 165/165 and a p3 750 and I'm getting 2350, so your score don't seem too bad. Overclocking it to 183/183 gave me about 100+ more point. Not worth it in my opinion to overclocked it that high. I think my processor is also bring it down.

[DocLiv]

http://gamershq.madonion.com/compare2k1.shtml?1565561

I'm only getting 9,195 points.:p

[Cisco Kid]

Scored 2649 , and I planed to buy a Radeon 32 DDR card used today but your scores do not seem to me much better so maybe save me cash and get a 64 ddr vivo or some form of Geforce 2 GTS, but their 2d video sucks .......

Cisco Kid:D


T Bird pc266 1.2 @ 1.2 w Global Win fop and cak 38 fan
MSI K7T266 Pro Raid DDR
2x256 Crucial pc2100 ddr
Maxtor ATA100 7200 rpm 60 gig
Asus V6800 Geforce 256 Deluxe 32 mb card w 20x drivers
Soundblaster pci128
Yamaha 8x8x24
Pine 44x cdrom
Realtek Nic
Sunny 375 AMD approved p supply
ADSL
1 Rear case fan

[Cisco Kid]

Originally posted by DocLiv
http://gamershq.madonion.com/compare2k1.shtml?1565561

I'm only getting 9,195 points.:p

DocLiv,

You are kicking some serious ass LOL way to go!!!!!

Cisco Kid:cool:

[DocLiv]

Thanks Cisco Kid!:) This thing is insane fast! I'm hoping to better that score soon. Got some better cooling on the way. Wish me luck!:)

[Pinky]

Originally posted by Violator
It_The_Cow

Are you saying you got over 4000 points at 1024x768x32 with 166/166 clock speeds and a P3 clocked at less than 1Ghz, AND the 7153 betas? I find that really hard to believe. If I drop my clock down to 166/166 I get just over 3100, and the 7153s are not the fastest for benchmarking

So, what's the deal It_the Cow?

here's my score (http://gamershq.madonion.com/compare2k1.shtml?1572090) for comparison.

I'm interested :).

**Update, I emailed him. I think it disrespectful to say anything more without the member aware we're asking/discussing their post. According to madonion, my score is tops for my card. Even beats the Athlons.

http://speshalk.dyndns.org:18012/radeoncomparison.jpg

[It_The_Cow]

Originally posted by Violator
It_The_Cow

Are you saying you got over 4000 points at 1024x768x32 with 166/166 clock speeds and a P3 clocked at less than 1Ghz, AND the 7153 betas? I find that really hard to believe. If I drop my clock down to 166/166 I get just over 3100, and the 7153s are not the fastest for benchmarking Oh, darn. Sorry about not replying faster. And thanks, Pinky. It was for 3DMark 2000. It was the lowest in My Documents, so I assumed it was for 2001. My real score was 2038. Now I'd probably get around 1500. Sorry for having mislead anyone :(

[Pinky]

Originally posted by It_The_Cow
Oh, darn. Sorry about not replying faster. And thanks, Pinky. It was for 3DMark 2000. It was the lowest in My Documents, so I assumed it was for 2001. My real score was 2038. Now I'd probably get around 1500. Sorry for having mislead anyone :(

That's why we ask. Other forums would have gone straight to flaming :p.

[TUK101]

Originally posted by hduong
Hey TUK101, How are yah liking the card? Well I have a radeon le 165/165 and a p3 750 and I'm getting 2350, so your score don't seem too bad. Overclocking it to 183/183 gave me about 100+ more point. Not worth it in my opinion to overclocked it that high. I think my processor is also bring it down. Thanks man, like I said, I am estatic about the 2300-2400 scores that I am getting now. Especially since it is almost twice what I was getting with my MX200 card. Although I do have to say that in some applications the Geforce2 was better. In all out fps though the Radeon just whupps but on the old MX200 though, and that is what really counts in racing games and shoot'em ups. I have to say to that I only have my card clocked at around 180-185 since it likes to go on a artifacting rampage at anything much above that. I added another fan to the top of my case blowing down on things and it helped bring temps down a couple of degrees.

[TUK101]

Originally posted by Pinky


That's why we ask. Other forums would have gone straight to flaming :p. Exactly Pinky, this is why I come to these forums rather than the other "flaming" happy sights where alls they want to do is argue. Great site, and great peaple.:cool:

[Violator]

Hope no-one thought I was flaming, I was more interested to see how It_the_cow had managed over 4000 with that clock speed :)

Damn it was for 2000, never mind.

[.. AE 86 ..]

does 4622 seem normal with my computer ?


\

[Burning Phoenix]

Looking at the top 3DMark2001 scores at default settings of 1028 X 768 X 32 Intel P4 now hold the top 5 spots. Top 10 only 3 are AMD.

3DMark2001 top 20 (http://gamershq.madonion.com/products/orb/?include_page=publish_search.shtml&current_chipsetid=1&current_cpuid=31&current_resolution=1024&current_bitdepth=16&current_cpuspeed=1751&current2001_chipsetid=61&current2001_cpuid=31&current2001_resolution=1024&current_bitdepth=32&current2001_bitdepth=32&current2001_cpuspeed=1785&current2001_FSAA=1&current2001_textureformat=64&project_type=6&cpuid=0&cpuspeed_from=&cpuspeed_to=&chipsetid=0&uscreenwidth=1024&bitdepth=32&fsaa=0&score_from=&score_to=&email=)

[Pinky]

Originally posted by Burning Phoenix
Looking at the top 3DMark2001 scores at default settings of 1028 X 768 X 32 Intel P4 now hold the top 5 spots. Top 10 only 3 are AMD.

3DMark2001 top 20 (http://gamershq.madonion.com/products/orb/?include_page=publish_search.shtml&current_chipsetid=1&current_cpuid=31&current_resolution=1024&current_bitdepth=16&current_cpuspeed=1751&current2001_chipsetid=61&current2001_cpuid=31&current2001_resolution=1024&current_bitdepth=32&current2001_bitdepth=32&current2001_cpuspeed=1785&current2001_FSAA=1&current2001_textureformat=64&project_type=6&cpuid=0&cpuspeed_from=&cpuspeed_to=&chipsetid=0&uscreenwidth=1024&bitdepth=32&fsaa=0&score_from=&score_to=&email=)

That's interesting. P4s are kicking ass above 2GHZ.. but clock for clock they don't match up, now 1.2 P4 clock for 1 AMD clock maybe :).

[Cisco Kid]

Well today I installed my new Radeon 64 DDR VIVO at default settings I ran 3D mark 2001 and scored 3249. This is a 600 point increase over my Asus V6800 256 Geforce DDR Deluxe 32 card so I am happy about that.

I am using the beta drivers from Pinky's site. What I could notice right away was the sharpness of the ATI card vs my nvdia based card. I am back with ATI and I can not wait to tweak it out and overclock my processor and see what score I get then.

Is my score good for default and not overclocked?

Cisco Kid:D


T - Birdy pc266 1.2 @ 1.2 w Global Win fop and cak 38 fan
MSI K7T266 Pro Raid DDR
2x256 Crucial pc2100 ddr
Maxtor ATA100 7200 rpm 60 gig
ATI Radeon DDR 64 VIVO
Soundblaster pci128
Yamaha 8x8x24
Pine 44x cdrom
Realtek Nic
Sunny 375 AMD approved p supply
ADSL
1 Rear case fan

[Violator]

New score 3734

http://gamershq.madonion.com/compare2k1.shtml?1623089

:)

Not bad for a 6ns Radeon

[Mr.Lansing]

I got 3106 marks in 3DMark2001
with my graphix card see my sig
@240 core x 240 ram
and my 1.2birdy @1400
i fink that's a pretty decent score for a clocked MX400

[Burning Phoenix]

P4 1.7 (nonoverclocked)
ASUS Geforce 2 GTS (220/280)

My 3DMark2001 score (http://gamershq.madonion.com/products/orb/?publish_compare.shtml?&project_type=6&dprid=1355279) = 3869 3dmarks

[Pinky]

Originally posted by Burning Phoenix
P4 1.7 (nonoverclocked)
ASUS Geforce 2 GTS (220/280)

My 3DMark2001 score (http://gamershq.madonion.com/products/orb/?publish_compare.shtml?&project_type=6&dprid=1355279) = 3869 3dmarks

We need to be fair to all trying to compare their scores. I could understand if one or two wouldn't run, since some are Geforce 3 enabled / intended tests, but the following tests were not run on your benchmark (shows my score and your results, "not available"):

Game 4 - Nature
(FPS) Not available

Not available


Fill Rate (Single-Texturing)
(MTexels/s) 332.0

Not available

Fill Rate (Multi-Texturing)
(MTexels/s) 948.6

Not available


High Polygon Count (1 Light)
(MTriangles/s) 6.1

Not available

High Polygon Count (8 Lights)
(MTriangles/s) 2.6

Not available


Environment Bump Mapping
(FPS) 74.5

Not available

DOT3 Bump Mapping
(FPS) 58.4

Not available


Vertex Shader Speed
(FPS) 23.9

Not available

Pixel Shader Speed
(FPS) Not available

Not available


Point Sprite Speed
(MSprites/s) 0.3

Not available

[Burning Phoenix]

Only the first 4 tests compute the score and the others do not affect the score in any way. I don't think anyone even looks at those other numbers anyways. The people with the Radean cards have an adavntage that they run the 4th test and gain a higher score from it over the geforce 2 cards. Makes for a score or around 10-15% higher than without that test. I think thats unfair to other card users. It makes the radean cards look faster than geforce 2 cards. To be fair those with radaen cards compare their results without running the 4th test instead.
All the settings were default also.

[Pinky]

Originally posted by Violator
New score 3734

http://gamershq.madonion.com/compare2k1.shtml?1623089

:)

Not bad for a 6ns Radeon

You got me by 3 friggin points!

Well, you can be the king. I have music to record now :).

[Pinky]

Originally posted by Burning Phoenix
The people with the Radean cards have an adavntage that they run the 4th test and gain a higher score from it over the geforce 2 cards. Makes for a score or around 10-15% higher than without that test. I think thats unfair to other card users. It makes the radean cards look faster than geforce 2 cards. To be fair those with radaen cards compare their results without running the 4th test instead.
All the settings were default also.

I guess that means we should also discount any Nature or Pixel Shading results for geforce 3 owners as well?

Could you run a full benchmark and post the results here to compare so we can see what you're talking about?

[TUK101]

Originally posted by Pinky


I guess that means we should also discount any Nature or Pixel Shading results for geforce 3 owners as well?

Could you run a full benchmark and post the results here to compare so we can see what you're talking about?
I agree, I mean the whole 3DMark2001 benchmark was developed to sell the Geforce 3. So how can he say that Radeons have an advantage? The Geforce 3 is the only card available that can run the "Nature" and Pixel Shader" tests.

[TUK101]

UPDATE:
Just recieved a 2896 score clocked at 133fsb 1066, with the video card clocked at 189.
Would paste an image of my scores on here, but couldnt get it to work lol. Have the screen captured of my score, but dont know how to set it into my post.:confused:

[Pinky]

Originally posted by TUK101
UPDATE:
Just recieved a 2896 score clocked at 133fsb 1066, with the video card clocked at 189.
Would paste an image of my scores on here, but couldnt get it to work lol. Have the screen captured of my score, but dont know how to set it into my post.:confused:

In your project manager on madonion.com there's a comparison link below your active project (it's in the form of a URL, you'd have to copy it from there and paste it as a link here).

Otherwise, screen shots could be .gif or .jpg images either attached to the original post or added as a IMG file (next to the http:// button / VB CODE). You'll need to either repost and attach the image, remembering there are limits to the size of the image, or copy the file to someplace like geocities/etc to host the image for WWW access.

[TUK101]

Originally posted by Pinky


In your project manager on madonion.com there's a comparison link below your active project (it's in the form of a URL, you'd have to copy it from there and paste it as a link here).

Otherwise, screen shots could be .gif or .jpg images either attached to the original post or added as a IMG file (next to the http:// button / VB CODE). You'll need to either repost and attach the image, remembering there are limits to the size of the image, or copy the file to someplace like geocities/etc to host the image for WWW access. Thanks man!!! Ill try it next time I have a good post.

[IYIENACE]

This thread is funny.
I was looking for specs on my 6yr old sons Radeon 7200 and search led me here. These guys are on the cutting edge w/ 3-4k scores in 3D01 lol.

Looks like the game never changes. Just the hardware. :bday: