View Full Version : Which is better? Ti4600 or FX5200?
Deptmaster
01-11-05, 09:34 PM
My room mate recently upgraded his video card to a 6600GT. He asked me if I wanted to buy his Ti4600 to use for my media center pc. I talked him down to $50 but I'm not sure if I'm better off with a FX5200 that I can get new for the same price. Which has better 3D performance?
I'm going to use it with my 2400+ mobile athlon XP, m-atx Nforce2 Ultra 400 motherboard, and 512MB Ram. Not the greatest gaming pc but it's enough for what I use it for.
Thanks for any help?
Quailane
01-11-05, 10:00 PM
This is easy, ti4600. If people start talking about certain situations where one might be better over the other, don't listen to them, the ti4600 is far superior. It was a top of the line card just before the bottom feeder fx5200 came out.
That would be comparing a performance card to an entry-level card. A quick search would reveal tons of these kinds of threads.
Deptmaster
01-11-05, 10:18 PM
I had an idea that was the case. I'm going to get the 4600.
Overclocker550
01-11-05, 10:20 PM
LOL comparing a fx5200 vs. ti4600 would be like trying to decide ti4600 vs. 6800gt or something. ti4600 is like 3 times faster vs. fx5200
stuperhero
01-11-05, 11:40 PM
i have both cards and the ti4600 is a beast the 5200 is a piece of crap.
redface
01-12-05, 02:06 AM
5200 supports Directx9 features. 4600 supports up to Directx8.1
But 5200 performance is turtle-ish.
Ti4600...what a great card. Just outstanding. the 5200 was equally as amazing, but in terms of horribleness and utter disgust.
Buhammot
01-12-05, 08:00 AM
Nice droban! Quite a dissappointment when I was goin from my GF3 ti200 to the 5200. Scary stuff! The part I liked best when it was on par with a gf4 mx card, which was still slower than my ti200 at the time...
sevendevilhell
01-12-05, 08:02 AM
yeah. the Ti isn't architected for dx9 like the FX5200 is, but its processing power is so far superior that it doesn't matter at all. take the Ti over the low-end FX. but now with the geforce 6 cards out, i say you can probably go for a high-end geforce FX card like a 5800 ultra or a 5900XT. those are very nice cards and now with the price drop that they're recieving, it's hard not to get one.
The FX5200 is the MX of the FX range.
The Ti4600 is a far superior overall card, the only slight advantage the FX5200 has is that it is DX9 vs DX8.1 on the Ti4600. However the fact the Ti4600 is a much more powerful card makes this, imho, irrelevant.
doublejack
01-12-05, 10:49 AM
Is there a good use for an FX 5200? It's too scratchy to be used as TP (although the stuff at work is pretty rough), not flat enough to be used as a coaster, too light to be used as a paper weight, not flamable enough to be used as fire wood... Sarcasm aside, they are certainly too slow for any serious gaming. Definitely go with the Ti4600.
jtc_hunter
01-12-05, 10:25 PM
Right now I believe the 3 best cards are :
Ti4600 for budget minded, is the very best bang for your buck
6600gt AGP if you have a medium budget and really play alot of DX9 games
6800gt top of the heap
these are the only 3 cards I would consider
doublejack
01-13-05, 09:06 AM
I agree with what jtc_hunter posted.
Anything between the Ti4600 and 6600GT is either inferior to the Ti so not worth the money, or substantially inferior to the 6600GT while being only a little cheaper (like say a 5900XT) - so it's better to spend a few extra and step up to the 6600GT.
At the top of the heap I would also go with a 6800GT over an Ultra. There's not much of a performance gap considering the price difference.
Pineabs
01-13-05, 09:16 AM
i agree with all of them ti4600 was the top of the line, and fx5200 is bottom of next gen. its like comparing a 9700 with a 9600.
vBulletin® v3.8.7, Copyright ©2000-2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.