View Full Version : WOW..look at this 3DMark2001 Score!!!
train22
09-16-01, 03:59 PM
With my system I got 697 3D Marks, what does that mean in relation to other systems and AGPs. The reason it sucks sooooooooooooooooooo bad is probably because of my graphic card, or so I hope, My graphic card didn't even support sevaral tests, what do you guys think?
I was getting between 2-20 fps on all of them, some in the low range some higher but that's the min-max range...
I'll take all comments now...
rig is in sig.
Ottoman
09-16-01, 04:14 PM
wow that's poop,
I think it's more than that, on my rig, with my GF1 DDR I was getting 2100, switched to Radeon 64mb DDR, and now I'm getting
like 2800 or more,
I think u may have some tweaking and driver stuff to work on...
cuz my buddy with a system similar to mine on an older card did alot better than yours...
sorry boss
funnyperson1
09-16-01, 04:22 PM
dude, with my rage fury pro(same chipset) i got 1200 on a p3, theres something wrong there.......
train22
09-16-01, 04:29 PM
it all wonder 128 pro, what's wrong there? dont' forget this is 3DMark2001, not 2000. The driver came right off the site, cause this is a win2k machine and the cd was only for 98 family. Any more comments, they help, I want to get a bit more out of this worthless ________
funnyperson1
09-16-01, 04:41 PM
the only thing wrong is your score....the rage 128 pro chip in there should be better than 600.........
gridsleep
09-16-01, 04:44 PM
I'm having the same problem with my Jaton TNT2 M64. 3DM2K in the 6-700 range. The rest of the system is shockingly fast (see below,) even not O/C. One thing with the KK266+R is the PCI multiplier is fixed at 1/3 and I can't find a way to change it. At 133MHz FSB, the PCI is running at 44MHz. The video keeps locking up, and today the screen started turning totally cyan from edge to edge. I think there is just something wrong with some of those TNT2 cards that the manufacturers aren't admitting. The TNT2 worked pretty much perfectly with my old 400MHz system. I sent a long request for assistance to Jaton and they still haven't replied after two weeks. Last week's events notwithstanding, I think I'm being ignored. I'm shopping around for an ATI Radeon VIVO 64MB DDR AGP (best price so far, $159 with s/h). At the moment I'm back to using my reliable Diamond Stealth II S220. It's only 4MB but it doesn't crap out on me.
gridsleep
09-16-01, 04:45 PM
PS-That's 3DM2K+1 (3DMark2001) up there, not 3DM2K.
train22
09-16-01, 05:03 PM
Just went through 3DMark2000 and got 1513, it looked ok, ranged between 15-30fps on most. 1 Thing that bugged me is that it says I used the All in wonder 128 AGP not the pro ver?? You think I need a driver upgrade because U am sure I got the pro on their site...
train22
09-16-01, 05:07 PM
bahh, just found out my card is a 128 not pro, bahhhh
which means it only has 16MB i think and a bad gpu.
train22
09-16-01, 05:08 PM
how many MB's are each chip? 4 or 8?
Originally posted by gridsleep
I'm having the same problem with my Jaton TNT2 M64. 3DM2K in the 6-700 range. The rest of the system is shockingly fast (see below,) even not O/C. One thing with the KK266+R is the PCI multiplier is fixed at 1/3 and I can't find a way to change it. At 133MHz FSB, the PCI is running at 44MHz. The video keeps locking up, and today the screen started turning totally cyan from edge to edge. I think there is just something wrong with some of those TNT2 cards that the manufacturers aren't admitting. The TNT2 worked pretty much perfectly with my old 400MHz system. I sent a long request for assistance to Jaton and they still haven't replied after two weeks. Last week's events notwithstanding, I think I'm being ignored. I'm shopping around for an ATI Radeon VIVO 64MB DDR AGP (best price so far, $159 with s/h). At the moment I'm back to using my reliable Diamond Stealth II S220. It's only 4MB but it doesn't crap out on me. The problem is that your cards dont support half of the tests. Those old cards were developed using directX 6.0 and dont support much stuff int he 3dmark2001 tests. now you will score significantly higher in 3dmark2000 as it is DirectX 7.0 intensive. I have an old Voodoo 3 that I replaced and was getting around 500-900 scores depending on how much I tweaked. I dont think that there is anything wrong with your card except that it is outdated for trying to run it in the "up to date" 3dmark2001 benchmarks. Sorry dude, I went through the same letdown when I payed 100 dollars for my Voodoo 3 only around 18 months ago, and since have had a 50 dollar Geforce Mx200, and now am running a Radeon 32mb ddr card. I now score 2400 in 3dmark 2001, up from the old 500 marks days (only 6 months ago). Good luck, and try some tweaking and OCing, and maybe you can get those scores up with your old cards, maybe.
oc jason
09-16-01, 06:37 PM
you need the correct AGP drivers for that chipset i am positivve of it.
funnyperson1
09-16-01, 08:46 PM
Originally posted by train22
bahh, just found out my card is a 128 not pro, bahhhh
which means it only has 16MB i think and a bad gpu.
the word youre looking for is a clasic gpu, youll find em in high end laptops nowadays......
FrankMasterFlash
09-16-01, 08:47 PM
Thats a good score compared to mine...I get like 60 in 3D Mark 2001 at default settings.:(
(EDIT)
Originally posted by FrankMasterFlash
Thats a good score compared to mine...I get like 60 in 3D Mark 2001 at lowest settings.:( You have got to be schmitting us lol. 60? what are you running? I need to know so that I avoid any of the componenents that are in your rig. Really, fill us in on what you have if you are at all serious.
AmbientFiction
09-16-01, 10:58 PM
I think he was saying 60FPS. Also the problem is that 3d 2001 is made for cards on the level of the GF3 and the new ATI8500. Its pure BS you should at least be able to change it to suite your needs when it comes to your card. Its just another way to sucker people into buying another Vid card. MD sucks although it is a good benchmarking tool.
FrankMasterFlash
09-16-01, 11:13 PM
My G200 is pure crap at 3d. 2d its decent.
I get a score of 980 at the absolute lowest settings in 3d mark 2001. I can't run it at anything above 640X480 or it gives me a BSOD, but I can run 3d Mark 2000 all day long.
xMercuryx
09-16-01, 11:32 PM
I get like 3000 and my fps ranges from 60-100
Bigwave
09-17-01, 02:49 AM
I can only squeeze out about 6000 points!
train22
09-17-01, 09:23 AM
Originally posted by FrankMasterFlash
Thats a good score compared to mine...I get like 60 in 3D Mark 2001 at default settings.:(
(EDIT)
don't forget that I do have a 10.5x153 speed machine, the gpu is doing nothing but sit inside my rig and ruin airflow
vBulletin® v3.8.7, Copyright ©2000-2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.