X800 XT PE owners: come on inside...

[ozziegn]

Okay, so I just finished setting up my new rig which consists of a 3.0E @ 3.8Ghz w/ an X800 XT PE and I decided to fire up a round of 3DMark05 to see what the system does. now I normally dont give a rat's a** about synthetic gaming benchmarks but in this case its really the only way for me to compare my system against similar ones with the same video card.

I got 5950 (http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=699274) on the benchmark and I was wondering if that sounds about right for an X800 XT PE equiped rig?

so if you have an X800 XT PE card, please post what kind of CPU it uses and what your 3DMark05 score is. I just want to get a general idea if I'm in the average neighborhood with my setup

[Mr.Guvernment]

mmm

i got an x800 XT and a 3.2E @ 3.71 and 1g 512 x 2 of OCZ pc4000 2.5-3-3-7 and i got


5705 on my last run......

vid card is @ stock.

Did you check the project compare? just look for othere X800 Xt PE cards and the cpu speed range of your cpu.

[DeepScience]

P2.6, 1GB memory, 4xAGP mobo
4908

[Binman_UK]

A64 3400+ S747 Newcastle @ 2.65GHz
2xCorsair 2x512MB Corsair XMS3200C2PT
Connect3D ATI Radeon x800 XT PE / 575/585

3DMARK2005 6313

Without o/cing the card, the numbers were about 5800 I think.

Binny.

[ropey]

X800 Pro Modded to X800 XT PE @ 560/1200
Celeron "D" Prescott 2.66 @ 3.8GHz
OCz PC3500EL @ 2-2-2-5

http://pictureposter.allbrand.nu/pictures/Ropey/3dmark.jpg

No overclock on the vid card and stock XT PE speeds came around 5800+ as well.

R

[Smokey21]

3700+ at 10x250
X800XT PE at stock gets me about 5900.
Clocked to 560/600 i get almost 6400.

[Wstinkbait]

Gigabyte GA-8KNXP ultra, i875
Intel Pentium 4, 3734 MHz/233 MHz FSB (932 efective)
ATI RADEON X800 XT Platinum Edition Corsair TwinX XMS4000 @466 MHZ
3Dmark 2001 23898 X800xt Platinum (http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=8106584)
3Dmark 2003 13480 X800xt Platinum (http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=3094862)
3Dmark 2005 6158 X800xt Platinum (http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=105549)

[ozziegn]

Gigabyte GA-8KNXP ultra, i875
Intel Pentium 4, 3734 MHz/233 MHz FSB (932 efective)
ATI RADEON X800 XT Platinum Edition Corsair TwinX XMS4000 @466 MHZ
3Dmark 2001 23898 X800xt Platinum (http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=8106584)
3Dmark 2003 13480 X800xt Platinum (http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=3094862)
3Dmark 2005 6158 X800xt Platinum (http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=105549)

now thats odd.

I just looked at your 05 scores and you're almost 200 points higher than me.

but what I dont understand is that my CPU score is 500 points higher than yours and we both have the same video card but yet I'm still 200 points lower than you in the overall benchmark score. I wouldnt think that my 200Mhz extra speed in my CPU over yours would yield that much of a difference in CPU score.

whats up with that?

*edit*

nevermind. I just noticed that your XT PE was O/Ced which as I said above, mine isnt. so there's the 200 point difference.

[murdok5]

in sig

[DeepScience]

in sig

I can't see it. You've only got 2003 there.

[sean478]

that is a pretty good score i put my friends x800xtpe in my 2nd rig and oced everything to its max and got 5650

[Smokey21]

in sig

675 on memory? I take it you sig means 575? lol. :p