OC3D domination

[Gautam]

Our team is just kicking some serious ass here. The amount of top six scores we've got up on the ORB is awesomely ridiculous. Check it.

D]g[ts - 1st place 9700 np class 3DMark2001 (http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=8105116)
D]g[ts - 3rd place 9800 Pro class 3DMark03 (http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=3821859)
D]g[ts - 3rd place - 9800 Pro class Aquamark3 (http://arc.aquamark3.com/arc/arc_compare.php?compareRunID=1696195853)
D]g[ts - 4th place X800XT class 3DMark2001 (http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=8584690)
D]g[ts - 6th place - X800XT class 3DMark03 (http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=3982009)
Stang8118 - 3rd place - 6600 class Aquamark3 (http://arc.aquamark3.com/arc/arc_compare.php?compareRunID=1965894324)
Sentential - 4th place single 6800GT class 3DMark2001 (http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=8490269)
Sentential - 5th place 5200 Ultra class 3DMark2001 (http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=8554420)
El<(')>Maxi - 5th place 9800 Pro class 3DMark2001 (http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=8284393)
El<(')>Maxi - 3rd place X850XT PE class 3DMark2001 (http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=8551109)
El<(')>Maxi - 2nd place 9500 np class 3DMark2001 (http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=8166263)
{PMS}Fishy - 1st place 6800 Ultra class 3DMark05 (http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=839591)
{PMS}Fishy - 2nd place single 6800 Ultra class 3DMark03 (http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=3958405)
{PMS}Fishy - 5th place X800XL class 3DMark03 (http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=3991998)
Sucka - 1st place X800 class Aquamark3 (http://arc.aquamark3.com/arc/arc_compare.php?compareRunID=1025269246)
Sucka - 6th place - X800XL class 3DMark2001 (http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=8558672)
bobmanfoo - 6th place - X850XT PE class 3DMark05 (http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=739542)
Gautam - 1st place 9800np class 3DMark2001 (http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=8381477)
Gautam - 1st place X800 Pro class 3DMark03 (http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=4029826)
Gautam - 1st place X800 Pro class Aquamark3 (http://arc.aquamark3.com/arc/arc_search.php?activeRunID=624274260)
Gautam - 3rd place X800 Pro class 3DMark2001 (http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=8601197)
Gautam - 3rd place X800 Pro class 3DMark05 (http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=815180)
NetworkGuru - 2nd place 5700LE class 3DMark05 (http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=859675)
abe08 - 3rd place 6200 class Aquamark3 (http://arc.aquamark3.com/arc/arc_view.php?run=154496830)
abe08 - 4th place 6200 class 3DMark05 (http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=913402)
abe08 - 5th place 6200 class 3DMark03 (http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=4027853)
electrorcamd - 1st place 5700LE class 3DMark05 (http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=911079)
electrorcamd - 2nd place 5700LE class 3DMark03 (http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=3977808)
electrorcamd - 4th place 5700LE class Aquamark3 (http://arc.aquamark3.com/arc/arc_view.php?run=1026877207)
lowfat - 4th place 9700 pro class 3DMark03 (http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=3727537)
ColtIce - 5th place 9700 pro class 3DMark03 (http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=3963848)
ColtIce - 6th place 9700 class Aquamark3 (http://arc.aquamark3.com/arc/arc_view.php?run=1161189758)

26 top 6's, 16 top 3's, and 7 1st place scores, and I'm not even sure I got all of them. Also, a couple more scores could make it if they're done with the latest builds and FM approved drivers. :) Keep it up folks! :thup:

[{PMS}fishy]

I also hold the record for the fastest 9500np in 03. I don't have the pro version, so I can't publish both scores.

Ill soon have the 01/05 records for that card too.

I might even try to take the top spot for 01 with a 6800, but Ill need to borrow an a64 for that.

[Gautam]

IIRC, a couple of others are in the same boat as you. :-/ I was wondering why I wasn't seeing your score up there.

I think I see the top 6800 01 score in the near future...;)

[Sentential]

Very nice indeed!

[{PMS}fishy]

Im sad an lonley at the top.

We need more competition, where are all the other members?

[crimedog]

i'm coming, i'm coming

[electrorcamd]

I have a couple with my FX5700LE except it says the drivers aren't Futuremark approved (even though they were the 66.93). My 01SE score is up there if you look for the ones within my cpu range.

[Sentential]

i'm coming, i'm coming
:eek:

[Sucka]

Sucka for the win..... :p

[{PMS}fishy]

Sucka for the win..... :p

Bring it on.

[Sentential]

Gautam you forgot to mention Zork and his scores

[speed bump]

He benches for XS though.

Time to try to convince SSS to give you some competion in the 6800 class as he seems to have a pretty decent rig to do it with.

[Gautam]

I have a couple with my FX5700LE except it says the drivers aren't Futuremark approved (even though they were the 66.93). My 01SE score is up there if you look for the ones within my cpu range.
Sorry mate, we're only counting FM approved scores done on the latest build ATM. CPU ranges don't count as a class either; we're talking overall for a certain type of card.


I tried to add some Aquamark scores, we're doing excellent in that benchmark as well. But if I thought the ORB was bad, the ARC is just horrendous. Sorry for you X800XL and X850 folk, Aquamark doesn't even have a category for you. :mad: And there's the SLI problem yet again for the 6600 and 6800 classes. :(

[veryhumid]

wooo! I just added my score: http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=3960237

I think that puts me in second place with no cpu overclock ;) ohhh lame. nm it doesn't count. I forgot i switched to beta ati drivers, so they are not approved.

[CCUABIDExORxDIE]

for a64's and 6600gt's i have the number one aquamark score. check it out there. http://arc.aquamark3.com/arc/arc_search.php?processorType=6&processorSpeedFrom=&processorSpeedTo=&graphicsType=62&graphicsCoreClockFrom=&graphicsCoreClockTo=&graphicsMemoryClockFrom=&graphicsMemoryClockTo=&displayMode=&displayDepth=&antiAliasingMode=&antiAliasingQuality=&anisotropicFiltering=&detailLevel=&resultType=AMScore

[CCUABIDExORxDIE]

but i think its 754 only :(

[mtb856]

:cry:

I want my desktop back................. must save money..... argh!!!!!!!!!!

[Spion]

damn, keep up the nice work :D

i'm definately not kicking ass with my 9600se, but i try my best

[d]g[ts]

Please let us remember Other members whom have had there scores dropped from ORB beacuse of using older builds of the benchmark. People like Bobtod, who had the overall highest 9800Pro score on the 03 orb. Or walldow who had the overall FX5700 score on the ORB.

[electrorcamd]

Sorry mate, we're only counting FM approved scores done on the latest build ATM. CPU ranges don't count as a class either; we're talking overall for a certain type of card.
I know. :) It's still pretty cool/good considering how much I originally paid for my computer compared to some people. I also just now realized that they switched the FM approved drivers from the 66.93 to the 71.89 so I reinstalled Windows and have been benching again. I haven't been able to beat my old scores yet though.

[NetworkGuru]

Umm, is it just me or are there no 3DMark03 scores for the FX5700LE class? That is with approved drivers and newest builds.

If someone can tell me how to join your OC3D Team I could give you a first place in the FX5700LE class. :D

I'm actually in the process of overclocking my video card right now. I have no idea how high it will go yet, but I just broke 2000 3DMarks at 320/471 (stock is 250/400). I'm hoping I can get my card to at least 500/500 by this weekend :D It is on stock cooling with an 80mm fan blowing air directly at it. Looking into adding some staplesinks.

[Gautam]

Yeah it looks like there aren't any on the ORB. That should be a pretty easy first place, lol. :D

All you gotta do is get a bench with FM approved drivers on the latest build, and put your forum screen name followed by the team's name in the title. So just title your published scores "NetworkGuru - OC3DMark Team," and post a link to it in the official thread, and you're set.

[electrorcamd]

^^^ There would be mine if it would accept my drivers (which are the FM approved ones). To join the team, where you put in the project name (default of Untitled) put in your forum name and "OC3DMark Team". Like on this one of mine for 3D05:
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=426186
Do a search with all drivers and you'll see my old 03 score of 3296.

Edit:
I took way too long to type that, lol.

[Gautam]

Those are some really impressive scores. :thup: Get some approved runs in and quick. ;)

[electrorcamd]

I don't think I can. I have Windows Server 2003 EE evaluation version. My last copy of Windows besides that is Win98SE. There aren't any drivers that are WHQL and FM approved for my os. I just remembered that.

[stang8118]

hehe i would be #1 in the 6600non GT for AM3, but the #1 and 2 (same person) has a model with the GDDR3 on it. So i guess i am #1 with the standard DDR. After i put my athlon xp HSF, ramsinks, and volt mod i should pull ahead by quite a bit :)

[Spion]

i'm guessing this isn't too bad of a score for a 9600se?

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=842040

srry if i'm crapping the thread, but i'm getting a new heatsink soon and i should be able to get alot higher core speed, only running 450 on that run with stock heatsink :)

and where can i get some good FM approved drivers that will let me OC? i'm guessing the omega's aren't ever going to be approved :(

[speed bump]

Wow this thread seems to be very motivational. Time to finish m voltmods and DI tubes so I can have the number 1 64meg card in 03.

[{PMS}fishy]

Borrowed a modded Mach I, all will suffer my wrath now.

[xTrEmEoVrClOcKr]

Once I get my mobo back (prob wont) Ill try to hang up with Fishy. (I can hit 4.3 benchable on a poopy mobo, I cant imagine what my cpu can hit on a droop modded board) but, I dont think I can bench at 500 core like Fishy :rolleyes: :p

[{PMS}fishy]

I dont think I can bench at 500 core like Fishy :rolleyes: :p

Should be 550+ by this time tommorrow. :D

[xTrEmEoVrClOcKr]

Whoa ....7k for 05 is possible for you then lol.

[{PMS}fishy]

Whoa ....7k for 05 is possible for you then lol.

I put up 6852 with slow GPU clocks, no tweaks, and very little effort.

It was only my second ever run at 05. I really hate that benchmark.

Ill give it a go, once I start to crush the x850XT PEs.

[xTrEmEoVrClOcKr]

Right on, all the ATi cards get special treatment in synthetic benchmarks. :p

[uclajd]

Wow, what's a guy gotta do to get some love around here. :cry:

[speed bump]

and where can i get some good FM approved drivers that will let me OC? i'm guessing the omega's aren't ever going to be approved

Try the Cat 4.12s you can download them from www.guru3d.com they are aprroved and one of the best drivers to use for 3dmark.

Then download ATI tool and go into options and select turn off overclock lock.

[Sentential]

Borrowed a modded Mach I, all will suffer my wrath now.
:clap:

[Gautam]

Wow, what's a guy gotta do to get some love around here. :cry:
Right now I only listed scores using approved drivers and the latest build...but to get loved, the 5th place you're in ain't good enough. :D Let's see that cascade take 18k down!

[Spion]

Try the Cat 4.12s you can download them from www.guru3d.com they are aprroved and one of the best drivers to use for 3dmark.

Then download ATI tool and go into options and select turn off overclock lock.
thx, i'm DLing them right now.

[uclajd]

but to get loved, the 5th place you're in ain't good enough. :D Let's see that cascade take 18k down!Man, talk about tough love. :cry:

[Gautam]

Man, talk about tough love. :cry:
Hehe, seriously we're very proud to have a cascade owner on board. The no FM approval crap doesn't make your scores any less impressive...not sure why they don't approve Omegas anyways. And your CPU speeds are just unreal.

[crimedog]

Hehe, seriously we're very proud to have a cascade owner on board.

seconded! just wish you were in the boston area ;)

[uclajd]

not sure why they don't approve Omegas anyways.Perhaps they aren't bought off? Isn't there some allegation like that about ATI and Futuremark? (disclaimer: I am only reporting on allegations, not making any of my own, and therefore I claim the conditional media privilege of accurate reporting on possible defamatory matters).

[xTrEmEoVrClOcKr]

It seems like that anyways, Nvidia ... BRIBE Futuremark jk lol. ;).

[Sucka]

Well, without Win2K and mods/water on my card, we're good for #3 XL class. I would expect to see #1 soon. I wasn't gonna mod this card as it was my daily card, but when i'm this close, it's a must :p I can bench the CPU higher i would imagine. Zork won't hold #1 for long if i have anything to say about it :) Win2K should put me over the top?

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=8572246

Imagine real cooling and mods...

[Sjaak]

Gogo guys!

I hope to be adding a record for x800 class and Dothan CPU in, say, a month or so ;)

[speed bump]

Sjaak that record right now is only 39k in 01 so heres to hoping you can break that. Of course that CPU was watercooled with with ice in the res and the GPU aircooled so you might be able to break it.

[ojibewa]

#1 for my hardware GO OC3 (http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v402/ojibewa/bench.jpg)

[uclajd]

FYI, I am testing a Dothan rig (http://www.ocforums.com/showpost.php?p=3702983&postcount=70) right now. Might not be until next weekend that I can hook up the phase change to the CPU and GPU, and get the multiplier working, but I think these Dothans will be breaking 40K in 2001 pretty commonly with advanced cooling.

Should have some nice numbers in a week or two. ;)

[Gautam]

I'll be joining you very shortly. P4C800-E Deluxe + 730. Should be fun.

[{PMS}fishy]

Im on the first page for the x800xl.

Should be taking the top spot pretty soon.

[electrorcamd]

Not cool.
I just scored 759 in 3DMark05, which is 7 ahead of every other 5700LE score. It would also be about #7 in the regular 5700 class, not including Ultras (then it would be about 12th). I ran it with the 71.89 drivers, but because I don't have 2K or XP, I use Server 2003. In turn, it says it is not WHQL approved (it really is) or FM approved.
I do have the #7 spot for 5700LEs in Aquamark 3, and the second highest score in 3DMark03 (with unapproved drivers).
:bang head
I'll edit this when I get my new 05 score published.

Edit:
It still won't let me publish my 05 score (seems like a server problem, it just kind of hangs at 'waiting for service.futuremark.com') but here is my AM3 score:
http://arc.aquamark3.com/arc/arc_view.php?run=1026877207

Edit 2:
I finally was able to publish my 05 score; I had to reboot into Linux for some reason; in Windows, it would just hang.
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=911079
I had to wipe my Server 03 install, so once I get Windows installed again, I will have new benches on a clean system.

[{PMS}fishy]

Not cool.
I just scored 759 in 3DMark05, which is 7 ahead of every other 5700LE score. It would also be about #7 in the regular 5700 class, not including Ultras (then it would be about 12th). I ran it with the 71.89 drivers, but because I don't have 2K or XP, I use Server 2003. In turn, it says it is not WHQL approved (it really is) or FM approved.
I do have the #7 spot for 5700LEs in Aquamark 3, and the second highest score in 3DMark03 (with unapproved drivers).
:bang head
I'll edit this when I get my new 05 score published.

Edit:
It still won't let me publish my 05 score (seems like a server problem, it just kind of hangs at 'waiting for service.futuremark.com') but here is my AM3 score:
http://arc.aquamark3.com/arc/arc_view.php?run=1026877207

Edit 2:
I finally was able to publish my 05 score; I had to reboot into Linux for some reason; in Windows, it would just hang.
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=911079
I had to wipe my Server 03 install, so once I get Windows installed again, I will have new benches on a clean system.


No Win2k3 drivers are FM approved.

[electrorcamd]

I know, but I'm still not sure why.

[{PMS}fishy]

I know, but I'm still not sure why.

Because FM is lazy. Im happy the lastest Nvida drivers are FM approved.

[Sentential]

Let the fun begin....

#3 In the world on Aquamark03 with a 6600:

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v180/Sentential/AQ3.jpg

#3 In the world on 2001SE with a 6800GT / Pentium4:

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v180/Sentential/2001SEGT.jpg

#3 In the world with a 5200FXU / Pentium4 in 2001SE

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v180/Sentential/5200.jpg

#6 In the world with a 5200FXU in 2001SE

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v180/Sentential/5200global.jpg

#..............

[Sentential]

1 and #2 in the world with a 6600 and Pentium4 in 2001SE

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v180/Sentential/6600local.jpg

#3 in the world with a Pentium4 / 6600 in 3dmark03

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v180/Sentential/660003.jpg

#1 in the world with a Pentium4 / 6600 in 3dmark05

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v180/Sentential/660005.jpg


____________

Pwned...

[xTrEmEoVrClOcKr]

Enjoy, cant wait to see your system with a 7800GTX ;).

[Sentential]

Enjoy, cant wait to see your system with a 7800GTX ;).
It all depends on pricing. If they have a $300-low 400 7800 with SLI then Ill bite.

[Gautam]

WTG my friend, those are some kickass scores. :thup:

[lowfat]

my 9700 pro had #5 on 3dmark05, but on Non WHQL - Not FM Approved :(

also has #3 on 3dmark03 with FM approved drivers :)

[Gautam]

Updated it. Kudos to abe08, electrorcamd, lowfat and ColtIce for some new great scores.

Won't punish you, electrorcamd, for Futuremark's stupidity.

[electrorcamd]

Won't punish you, electrorcamd, for Futuremark's stupidity.
Cool, thanks.
BTW, you flipped my 03 and 05 around. It should be 1st place in 05, and 2nd in 03 and the links are opposite of what they should be right now (03 link is in 05 text, and 05 in 03).