- Joined
- Jun 25, 2004
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;q314878
"The smaller the cluster size, the more efficiently your disk stores information."
BUT
"The following table shows the default values that Windows XP uses for NTFS formatting.
Drive size
(logical volume) --- Cluster size --- Sectors
----------------------------------------------------------
512 MB or less -- 512 bytes -- 1
513 MB - 1,024 MB (1 GB)-- 1,024 bytes (1 KB) -- 2
1,025 MB - 2,048 MB (2 GB)-- 2,048 bytes (2 KB) -- 4
2,049 MB and larger -- 4,096 bytes (4 KB) -- 8 "
--------I'm pretty sure also in original Windows XP installs (through the disk) it uses those same default values. There must be some way to use smaller values than default (I have an 80GB drive). If they say a lower cluster size is more desirable, then why in hell would they default to the largest one? Anyway know if this is correct or if there is a work around?
"The smaller the cluster size, the more efficiently your disk stores information."
BUT
"The following table shows the default values that Windows XP uses for NTFS formatting.
Drive size
(logical volume) --- Cluster size --- Sectors
----------------------------------------------------------
512 MB or less -- 512 bytes -- 1
513 MB - 1,024 MB (1 GB)-- 1,024 bytes (1 KB) -- 2
1,025 MB - 2,048 MB (2 GB)-- 2,048 bytes (2 KB) -- 4
2,049 MB and larger -- 4,096 bytes (4 KB) -- 8 "
--------I'm pretty sure also in original Windows XP installs (through the disk) it uses those same default values. There must be some way to use smaller values than default (I have an 80GB drive). If they say a lower cluster size is more desirable, then why in hell would they default to the largest one? Anyway know if this is correct or if there is a work around?