218mhz @ 2-3-3-6 or 228mhz @ 2.5-4-3-6

maxxoverclocker · Jul 30, 2005

hey im just wondering which settings will get me the most out of my system thx

rseven · Jul 31, 2005

I am not a P4 person, but I would venture to say you are better off with the higher ckock speed. You don't have to take anyone's word for it, just run some benchmarks. Good luck.

HousERaT · Jul 31, 2005

Without knowing for sure (I haven't used Intel in ages) I believe Intel rigs benefit most from high fsb. My guess is you'd find better performance from the 228fsb.

maxxoverclocker · Jul 31, 2005

alright thx guys i did a sandra bench and they were the same (within 20mb/s) but turns out that the cas 2 isn't stable

rseven · Jul 31, 2005

maxxoverclocker said:
alright thx guys i did a sandra bench and they were the same (within 20mb/s) but turns out that the cas 2 isn't stable

Then that really seals the deal. Go for the higher clock.

Janus67 · Jul 31, 2005

as said above go for the higher clock, from what I have read Intel likes higher FSB over timings.

maxxoverclocker · Jul 31, 2005

alright i can run 228 @ 2-4-3-6 or 228 @ 2.5-3-3-6 lol my system is picky

what would you guys choose? keeping in mind its a p4. benches gave me pretty much the same results but is there one that is inherently better than the other? thx

edit: scratch that only the cas 2 was stable @ 3v, i swear lmao dual primed and a game for an hour then when i restart the damn thing doesn't load windows! lol, but thx for the help

218mhz @ 2-3-3-6 or 228mhz @ 2.5-4-3-6

maxxoverclocker

Member

rseven

Member

HousERaT

Senior Air Extraordinaire

maxxoverclocker

Member

rseven

Member

Janus67

Benching Team Leader

maxxoverclocker

Member

Similar threads