View Full Version : Is this bad?
I checked my log and saw this:
- Couldn't get info for dyn file: work/wudata_04.dyn
Starting from initial work packet
Protein: EngHomeodomain
- Frames Completed: 0, Remaining: 200
- Dynamic steps required: 100000
Is this bad or not? I am just curious.
I am using 2.1 F@H!!!!
It's only bad if you had 190/200 and it started over.
Otherwise it's ok. It does that everytime the client close the core65.exe and then restarts it, which is every time you get a new protein.
burn'em
10-20-01, 08:54 PM
Originally posted by Ploaf
It's only bad if you had 190/200 and it started over.
Otherwise it's ok. It does that everytime the client close the core65.exe and then restarts it, which is every time you get a new protein.
I had 199 of 200 and lost it when 2.0 locked up.
At least it wasn't a villin:cool:
-=HN=- Wild9
10-20-01, 09:06 PM
i just got villin, 1000 frames!!!:(
Originally posted by -=HN=- Wild9
i just got villin, 1000 frames!!!:(
Not to worry. A) The frames go fast and B) You should get two points for turning it in ;)
You do!!! 2 for a villin. mine just got posted.
Stanman
10-20-01, 09:56 PM
How long does it take per frame on Villian? :)
I really don't know. I am lazy and I don't know of a monitor for 2.1.
Stanman
10-20-01, 10:11 PM
How many frames per minute or minutes per frame do you get? Just time it with your clock. :)
I have one working on my celeron 560. I will time it on my 1.4 TB when I get one.
Stanman
10-20-01, 10:28 PM
I have been getting over four frames a minute on XP TBird running at 1333, :)
That is fast. I will definitely time it the next time it comes around.
-=HN=- Wild9
10-20-01, 10:36 PM
im getting about 3.5 frames per minute on my celery
Originally posted by Stanman
I have been getting over four frames a minute on XP TBird running at 1333, :)
Very nice indeed. Is XP quicker than win2k?
A little over 4 frames a minute for villin!
vBulletin® v3.8.7, Copyright ©2000-2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.