d.chatten said:
As far as i know it's a driver issue on the part of NVIDIA so i hope they can and will add support for SLI on the 955X chipset seeing as ASUS say the second PCI-E slot now supports x8 mode but i'm not sure if that implies SLI will be supported in the future using two x8 PCI-E slots.
I would take all this with a pinch of salt as there's some smart talk going on in regards to the Asus phone conversation. Of course in theory a 16x wide PCI-E socket on the P5WD2P can run at 8x but only in theory. The reasoning behind this is that OK yes physically it's connected (i.e. the pin connections between it and the motherboard are in place) however electronically it's not possible. The 955X from my memory can only support 22 PCI-E lanes. With 16x going to the primary GFX card connector this leaves 6x spare. As Asus has made it a maximum of 4x can be assigned to the secondary PCI-E x16 slot leaving 1x for the motherboard's PCI-E 1x connector (second from bottom) and 1x for the Gigabit LAN. Because of this they were forced to make the 2nd Gigabit LAN run from the PCI bus (a mistake in my book but oh well).
The only way they could ever make the second PCI-E x16 length slot work at 8x is if they divided the primary 16x PCI-E slot into 2x8. Because StackCool2 in on the back of the board it's impossible to make out whether enough lanes are connected to the 2nd PCI-E 16x slot in order to do this. My guess is a very good "no". Why do I think my guess is spot on? If Asus indeed could transform the board into 2x8x PCI-E slots then it would have already made a big loud marketing boom from day 1.
In short the design people got carried away thinking Nvidia will certify their board for SLI and were also hoping CrossFire would arrive much sooner. As has happened however both have been delayed/dismissed so Asus has kept quiet about it so as to not hamper new sales of this board.
My guess is Asus will continue to stay low profiled about this issue, they would rather it just gradually fades away into one's memory. They will attempt to divert all attention to their 975X product in the forseeable future.
As a result of this mistake in design based on the assumptions of ATI/Nvidia mentioned above the P5WD2 is worse specified than the P5AD2-E Premium before it. The other reason why it's worse specified is cost, Asus realized they could make more money by taking the Wireless LAN part and sticking it onto an add-on card and charging around $50 more. The only thing that the P5WD2 can really do better than its predessor is overclock plus of course offer some features coming directly from the 955X chipset itself.
The bottom line from my analysis is this. If you expect to run SLI or CrossFire on the P5WD2P then dismiss your hopes now. It won't happen or will but with a performance penalty making it non-feasible. The 2nd PCI-E 16x length slot is limited to 4x speed. Why? Even in BIOS version 606 the highest option is 4x, a BIOS that supposedly supports CrossFire? Asus's official line apparently reads it supports CrossFire, but what it should read is your 2nd GFX card will be limited to 4x, please forgive us. The only thing you can do is run two GFX's for multi-monitor support. They got it wrong, what they hoped for was an edge on the competition, the reality made it into a unmaterialized mistake.
My only hope is Asus people don't try to be as smart next time and do a much better job with the 975X board. Fingers crossed everyone.