• Welcome to Overclockers Forums! Join us to reply in threads, receive reduced ads, and to customize your site experience!

Can KT133 motherboards run msdos?

Overclockers is supported by our readers. When you click a link to make a purchase, we may earn a commission. Learn More.

jae87

Registered
Joined
Mar 25, 2001
Just wondering if those KT133/A and KLE133 boards can run ms-dos and win 3.1?

Also, what's the latest motherboards that still can run native dos/win 3.1?
 
as stated above, basically anything can run dos. anything that has a harddrive detected by the bios that is; ie. not a raid controller.

can it run win 3.1? sure can.. fast enough you wont even see the splash screen.

have fun!
 
Well, you may run into some difficulty with drivers for some things, but any basic hardware that meets the specs in use during the DOS days will probably be ok, at least in a basic mode.
Modern grapics cards, sound, modems and anything that says it requires Win98 or better is likely to be a problem.

Many chipsets (at least a few years ago) can run ok with generic drivers although speed enhancements won't work.

The last system I ran DOS on was a 900mhz TBird, quite a few years ago.
Fastest OS I have ever seen. :D:D
 
video shouldn't be an issue since most things that run in dos need very little video power. sound might be a problem unless you get something simple like a sound blaster 16 as they run fine in dos.

for a modem you would most likely have to find an external serial modem or an interal that still lets you manually choose what COM port they run on. hard to find anymore.

ethernet isn't too hard if you stick to older technology. a lot of the 3com cards have dos drivers.
 
...or you could run msdos/win3.1 in an emulator like virtual pc. it works ok.
 
EMM386 is a device driver used by DOS/Win3.1 and Win95 for a few purposes:

1) Loading TSRs and Device Drivers high to preserve conventional memory (0-640K is conventional RAM, 641K-1024K is the Upper Memory Area, originally used for ROM, RAM on perhipheral devices, and memory-mapped input output. Terribly inefficient, since most of that space was actually unused.)
2) Running applications (Windows 3.1 and 95) above 1MB in Extended Memory.
 
Back