PDA

View Full Version : difference between 2.5-4-4-7 & 3-3-3-8


yocozuna55
02-21-06, 12:10 PM
how much of a diffence will I see if I go from one to another pc3200 ram.

bchur83
02-21-06, 12:18 PM
Well, if you are adding to an existing set of ram, it will run 3-4-4-8 overall. You may be able to tweak them to run tighter, but expect 3-4-4-8. If you are replacing them, stick with the 2.5-4-4-7 set.

>HyperlogiK<
02-21-06, 12:24 PM
No, real world performance wise there isn't even much between 2.5-4-4-7 and 2-2-2-5.

Eldonko
02-21-06, 10:03 PM
how much of a diffence will I see if I go from one to another pc3200 ram.3-3-3 will be slightly faster than 2.5-4-4.

Bios24
02-22-06, 03:51 AM
What are your system specs? From what I've read, in a modern system you're looking at less than a 5% difference in performance based on timings alone. I wouldn't worry about it too much.

Bios24
02-22-06, 03:52 AM
3-3-3 will be slightly faster than 2.5-4-4.

Wait, I just read that, what?? Wouldn't lower timings be faster?

dawei213
02-22-06, 06:02 AM
What do you mean by "difference"?

If you meant benchmark, you might see a few % bit of difference here and there.

If you meant real world performance, you probably won't notice the difference.

Eldonko
02-22-06, 10:33 PM
Wait, I just read that, what?? Wouldn't lower timings be faster?Don't worry about CAS, RAS to CAS (trcd) is where you gain the performance.

yocozuna55
02-22-06, 10:40 PM
Don't worry about CAS, RAS to CAS (trcd) is where you gain the performance.
really?...cool guess I'll stick with 3-3-3-8 then...thanks for the input.

(cf)eclipse
02-23-06, 08:28 AM
Wait, I just read that, what?? Wouldn't lower timings be faster?
yes, and which is lower, 3-3-3 or 2.5-4-4? ;)

hoho220
02-23-06, 09:18 AM
what about running 2.5-4-3 vs 3-3-3